Trial reportNature human behaviour2021
Healthful choices depend on the latency and rate of information accumulation.
Trial report in Nature human behaviour, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Neural Decision-Making and Affective Dynamics in Weight Regain after Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: A Multimodal Longitudinal Computational Psychiatry Study.Obesity surgery · 2026Article
- Delayed reward information is underweighted in reinforcement learning with dispersed feedback.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Domain-specific effects of hunger on attention and choice.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Choice-induced preference change under a sequential sampling model framework.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Attentional biases in self-control are associated with reward cue-related brain activity.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2026Article
- Recovery attributions and future expectations for antibiotics after precautionary prescribing.European journal of public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Relative social status alters the synchrony of attribute integration in altruistic decisions.iScience · 2025Article
- Unraveling the neural basis of repeated moral decisions with mouse tracking and fMRI.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Heuristics in risky decision-making relate to preferential representation of information.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Brain activity of professional investors signals future stock performance.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Attribute latencies causally shape intertemporal decisions.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Experiencing nature leads to healthier food choices.Communications psychology · 2024Article
- Mapping expectancy-based appetitive placebo effects onto the brain in women.Nature communications · 2024Article
- The Willpower Paradox: Possible and Impossible Conceptions of Self-Control.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2023Article
- Having multiple selves helps learning agents explore and adapt in complex changing worlds.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Face masks influence emotion judgments of facial expressions: a drift-diffusion model.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- A value accumulation account of unhealthy food choices: testing the influence of outcome salience under varying time constraints.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2023Article
- The Games We Play: Prosocial Choices Under Time Pressure Reflect Context-Sensitive Information Priorities.Psychological science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The drift diffusion model provides a parsimonious explanation of decisions across neurobiological, psychological and behavioural levels of analysis. Although most drift diffusion model implementations assume that only a single value guides decisions, choices often involve multiple attributes that could make separable contributions to choice. Here we fit incentive-compatible dietary choices to a multi-attribute, time-dependent drift diffusion model, in which taste and health could differentially influence the evidence accumulation process. We find that these attributes shaped both the relative value signal and the latency of evidence accumulation in a manner consistent with participants' idiosyncratic preferences. Moreover, by using a dietary prime, we showed how a healthy choice intervention alters multi-attribute, time-dependent drift diffusion model parameters that in turn predict prime-dependent choices. Our results reveal that different decision attributes make separable contributions to the strength and timing of evidence accumulation, providing new insights into the construction of interventions to alter the processes of choice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34226708What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.