Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34226702›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2021

A 51,000-year-old engraved bone reveals Neanderthals' capacity for symbolic behaviour.

Dirk Leder, Raphael Hermann, Matthias Hüls, Gabriele Russo, Philipp Hoelzmann, Ralf Nielbock, Utz Böhner, Jens Lehmann, Michael Meier, Antje Schwalb and 3 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
69.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Humans 40,000 y ago developed a system of conventional signs.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Early human collective practices and symbolism in the Early Upper Paleolithic of Southwest Asia.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. From fossils to mind.Communications biology · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Dirk LederState Service for Cultural Heritage Lower Saxony (Niedersächsisches Landesamt für Denkmalpflege), Hannover, Germany. Dirk.Leder@nld.niedersachsen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6249-5323
Raphael HermannSeminar of Prehistoric Archaeology, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5588-0696
Matthias HülsLeibniz-Laboratory for Radiometric Dating and Stable Isotope Research, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Gabriele RussoInstitute of Archaeological Sciences, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1201-6379
Philipp HoelzmannInstitute of Geographical Sciences, Freie Universität, Berlin, Germany.
Ralf NielbockGesellschaft Unicornu fossile e.V., Einhornhöhle, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1859-185X
Utz BöhnerState Service for Cultural Heritage Lower Saxony (Niedersächsisches Landesamt für Denkmalpflege), Hannover, Germany.
Jens LehmannState Service for Cultural Heritage Lower Saxony (Niedersächsisches Landesamt für Denkmalpflege), Hannover, Germany.
Michael MeierState Service for Cultural Heritage Lower Saxony (Niedersächsisches Landesamt für Denkmalpflege), Hannover, Germany.
Antje SchwalbInstitute of Geosystems and Bioindication, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Brunswick, Germany.
Andrea Tröller-ReimerState Service for Cultural Heritage Lower Saxony (Niedersächsisches Landesamt für Denkmalpflege), Hannover, Germany.
Tim KoddenbergDepartment of Wood Biology and Wood Products, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1908-9864
Thomas TerbergerState Service for Cultural Heritage Lower Saxony (Niedersächsisches Landesamt für Denkmalpflege), Hannover, Germany. Thomas.Terberger@phil.uni-goettingen.de.
Niedersächsisches Landesamt für Denkmalpflege · DEUniversity of Göttingen · DEChristian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel · DEFreie Universität Berlin · DENiedersächsisches Landesgesundheitsamt · DETechnische Universität Braunschweig · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While there is substantial evidence for art and symbolic behaviour in early Homo sapiens across Africa and Eurasia, similar evidence connected to Neanderthals is sparse and often contested in scientific debates. Each new discovery is thus crucial for our understanding of Neanderthals' cognitive capacity. Here we report on the discovery of an at least 51,000-year-old engraved giant deer phalanx found at the former cave entrance of Einhornhöhle, northern Germany. The find comes from an apparent Middle Palaeolithic context that is linked to Neanderthals. The engraved bone demonstrates that conceptual imagination, as a prerequisite to compose individual lines into a coherent design, was present in Neanderthals. Therefore, Neanderthal's awareness of symbolic meaning is very likely. Our findings show that Neanderthals were capable of creating symbolic expressions before H. sapiens arrived in Central Europe.

Indexed as

DeerNeanderthalsAnimalsBone and BonesCavesEuropeHumansInfant, Newborn

Identifiers

PMID34226702
OpenAlexW3180427099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.