ArticleScientific reports2021
Nutritional quality, nutrient uptake and biomass production of Pennisetum purpureum cv. King grass.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Remote sensing-based evapotranspiration and soil water balance estimation for a tropical pasture in Brazil using the SETMI model.International journal of biometeorology · 2026Article
- Responses of Restored Vegetation Communities, Soil Properties, and Microbial Composition to Different Fertilization Treatments in an Alpine Mining Area.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Inclusion of different levels of fermented elephant grass in broiler chicken diet: effects on growth, physiology, carcass traits and gut microbial community.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Effects of Lactic Acid Bacteria on Fermentation and Nutritional Value of BRS Capiaçu Elephant Grass Silage at Two Regrowth Ages.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Article
- Genome-based taxonomy and functional prediction of Sphingomonas fuzhouensis sp. nov. and Massilia phyllosphaerae sp. nov. isolated from Pennisetum sp. with plant growth-promoting potential.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2024Article
- System of wheat intensification (SWI): Effects on lodging resistance, photosynthetic efficiency, soil biomes, and water productivity.PloS one · 2024Article
- Exploring the effect of wilting on fermentation profiles and microbial community structure during ensiling and air exposure of king grass silage.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- The Effect of Early and Delayed Harvest on Dynamics of Fermentation Profile, Chemical Composition, and Bacterial Community of King Grass Silage.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The research was conducted to determine the effects of cutting interval and fertilization on the nutritional quality, nutrient uptake, and biomass production of King grass. The experimental design was a randomized complete block, using 4 blocks and 8 treatments per block; treatments consisted of 4 ages of cutting (30, 45, 60, and 90 days), with fertilization and without fertilization. The results showed increases of up to 72,000 kg ha
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.