Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34226570›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Exhaled volatilome analysis as a useful tool to discriminate asthma with other coexisting atopic diseases in women of childbearing age.

Rosa A Sola-Martínez, Gema Lozano-Terol, Julia Gallego-Jara, Eva Morales, Esther Cantero-Cano, Manuel Sanchez-Solis, Luis García-Marcos, Pedro Jiménez-Guerrero, José A Noguera-Velasco, Manuel Cánovas Díaz and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Discovery and Validation of a Volatile Signature of Eosinophilic Airway Inflammation in Asthma.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rosa A Sola-MartínezDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology B and Immunology, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Gema Lozano-TerolDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology B and Immunology, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Julia Gallego-JaraDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology B and Immunology, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Eva MoralesBiomedical Research Institute of Murcia, IMIB-Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain.
Esther Cantero-CanoBiomedical Research Institute of Murcia, IMIB-Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain.
Manuel Sanchez-SolisBiomedical Research Institute of Murcia, IMIB-Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain.
Luis García-MarcosBiomedical Research Institute of Murcia, IMIB-Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain.
Pedro Jiménez-GuerreroRegional Atmospheric Modelling Group, Department of Physics, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
José A Noguera-VelascoDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology B and Immunology, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Manuel Cánovas DíazDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology B and Immunology, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Teresa de Diego PuenteDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology B and Immunology, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain. tdp@um.es.
NELA study group
Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria · ESInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESUniversidad de Murcia · ESUniversitat de València · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence of asthma is considerably high among women of childbearing age. Most asthmatic women also often have other atopic disorders. Therefore, the differentiation between patients with atopic diseases without asthma and asthmatics with coexisting diseases is essential to avoid underdiagnosis of asthma and to design strategies to reduce symptom severity and improve quality of life of patients. Hence, we aimed for the first time to conduct an analysis of volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath of women of childbearing age as a new approach to discriminate between asthmatics with other coexisting atopic diseases and non-asthmatics (with or without atopic diseases), which could be a helpful tool for more accurate asthma detection and monitoring using a noninvasive technique in the near future. In this study, exhaled air samples of 336 women (training set (n = 211) and validation set (n = 125)) were collected and analyzed by thermal desorption coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. ASCA (ANOVA (analysis of variance) simultaneous component analysis) and LASSO + LS (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator + logistic regression) were employed for data analysis. Fifteen statistically significant models (p-value < 0.05 in permutation tests) that discriminated asthma with other coexisting atopic diseases in women of childbearing age were generated. Acetone, 2-ethyl-1-hexanol and a tetrahydroisoquinoline derivative were selected as discriminants of asthma with other coexisting atopic diseases. In addition, carbon disulfide, a tetrahydroisoquinoline derivative, 2-ethyl-1-hexanol and decane discriminated asthma disease among patients with other atopic disorders. Results of this study indicate that refined metabolomic analysis of exhaled breath allows asthma with other coexisting atopic diseases discrimination in women of reproductive age.

Indexed as

ExhalationAdultAsthmaBreath TestsDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryHumansHypersensitivity, ImmediateQuality of LifeVolatile Organic CompoundsVolatile Organic Compounds

Identifiers

PMID34226570
PMCPMC8257728
OpenAlexW3178107887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.