Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34226225›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Prayer as a pain intervention: protocol of a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

Alexandra Ferreira-Valente, Margarida Jarego, Inês Queiroz-Garcia, Filipa Pimenta, Rui Miguel Costa, Melissa A Day, José Pais-Ribeiro, Mark P Jensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alexandra Ferreira-ValenteWilliam James Center for Research, ISPA - University Institute, Lisbon, Portugal mafvalente@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3684-5561
Margarida JaregoWilliam James Center for Research, ISPA - University Institute, Lisbon, Portugal.
Inês Queiroz-GarciaWilliam James Center for Research, ISPA - University Institute, Lisbon, Portugal.
Filipa PimentaWilliam James Center for Research, ISPA - University Institute, Lisbon, Portugal.
Rui Miguel CostaWilliam James Center for Research, ISPA - University Institute, Lisbon, Portugal.
Melissa A DayDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
José Pais-RibeiroWilliam James Center for Research, ISPA - University Institute, Lisbon, Portugal.
Mark P JensenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPain is a universal experience and the most common reason for seeking healthcare. Inadequate pain management negatively impacts numerous aspects of patient health. Multidisciplinary treatment programmes, including psychosocial interventions, are more useful for pain management than purely biomedical treatment alone. Recently, researchers showed increasing interest in understanding the role of spirituality/religiosity and spiritual/religious practices on pain experience, with engagement in religious practices, such as prayer, showing to positively impact pain experience in religious individuals. This systematic review will seek to summarise and integrate the existing findings from randomised controlled trials assessing the effects of prayer and prayer-based interventions on pain experience.

methodsThe systematic review procedures and its report will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Electronic searches in nine databases (Web of Science Core Collection, MEDLINE, SCIELO Citation Index, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trial, PsycINFO, Scopus, LILACS and Open-SIGLE) will be performed to identify randomised controlled trials of prayer-based interventions. Two independent researchers will assess studies for inclusion and extract data from each paper. Risk of bias assessment will be assessed independently by two reviewers based on the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement. Qualitative synthesis of the body of research will be conducted using a narrative summary synthesis method. Meta-analysis will be limited to studies reporting on the same primary outcome. Formal searches are planned to start in June 2021. The final report is anticipated to be completed by September 2021. DISCUSSION: Findings will be useful to (1) understand the condition of our knowledge in this field and (2) provide evidence for prayer effectiveness in reducing pain intensity and pain-related stress and increasing pain tolerance in adults experiencing acute or chronic pain. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020221733.

Indexed as

PainResearch DesignAdultHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSystematic Reviews as Topiccomplementary medicinepain managementstatistics & research methods

Identifiers

PMID34226225
PMCPMC8258549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.