Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34226209›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Management of social isolation and loneliness in community-dwelling older adults: protocol for a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Ahreum Lee, Caitlin McArthur, Areti Angeliki Veroniki, Monika Kastner, George Ioannidis, Lauren E Griffith, Lehana Thabane, Jonathan D Adachi, Alexandra Papaioannou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ahreum LeeHealth Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0882-6256
Caitlin McArthurGERAS Centre for Aging Research, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Areti Angeliki VeronikiDepartment of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Epirus, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-6388-4825
Monika KastnerKnowledge Translation and Implementation, Research and Innovation, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
George IoannidisGERAS Centre for Aging Research, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Lauren E GriffithHealth Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2794-9692
Lehana ThabaneHealth Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Jonathan D AdachiDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Alexandra PapaioannouHealth Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada papaioannou@hhsc.ca.
Impact · CAMcMaster University · CASt. Michael's Hospital · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSocial isolation and loneliness in older adults are significant public health issues. Various interventions such as exercise programmes or social activities are used in the management of social isolation and loneliness in older adults. Network meta-analysis (NMA) provides effect estimates for all comparisons by considering the relative efficacy of multiple intervention alternatives. Therefore, this study will determine the comparative efficacy of intervention to alleviate social isolation and loneliness of older adults in community dwelling by comparing direct and indirect interventions through systematic review and NMA. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will include all relevant randomised controlled trials for interventions of social isolation and loneliness in older adults written in English without any limitation of publication date through electronic databases: MEDLINE via OVID, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PsycINFO and CINAHL. Independent teams of reviewers will screen trial eligibility, collect data, identify duplication and assess risk of bias, by using the Cochrane revised risk of bias tool. The interventions for the management of social isolation and loneliness will be included. The primary outcome is social isolation. The secondary outcomes are loneliness and health-related quality of life. We will conduct an NMA through a Bayesian hierarchical model, by testing assumption (ie, transitivity) for NMA. We will also estimate the ranking probabilities for all interventions at each possible rank for each intervention. For estimation of each intervention efficacy, we will assess the certainty and credibility using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval will not be obtained for this systematic review as it will be conducted with published papers. The review results will be presented at a field-specific conference and published in a relevant peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020155789.

Indexed as

Independent LivingLonelinessAgedBayes TheoremHumansNetwork Meta-Analysis as TopicQuality of LifeSocial IsolationSystematic Reviews as Topicgeriatric medicinemental healthstatistics & research methods

Identifiers

PMID34226209
PMCPMC8258567
OpenAlexW3181689396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.