Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34226192›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2021

Use of cast immobilisation versus removable brace in adults with an ankle fracture: multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Rebecca Kearney, Rebecca McKeown, Helen Parsons, Aminul Haque, Nick Parsons, Henry Nwankwo, James Mason, Martin Underwood, Anthony C Redmond, Jaclyn Brown and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Rehabilitation for ankle fractures in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Cast versus removable orthosis for the management of stable type B ankle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca KearneyWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK R.S.Kearney@warwick.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8010-164X
Rebecca McKeownWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3502-2328
Helen ParsonsWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2765-3728
Aminul HaqueWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3589-6751
Nick ParsonsWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9975-888X
Henry NwankwoWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7401-1923
James MasonWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9210-4082
Martin UnderwoodWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0309-1708
Anthony C RedmondLeeds Institute for Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8709-9992
Jaclyn BrownWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3110-8594
Siobhan KeffordWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0976-9353
Matthew CostaOxford Trauma and Emergency Care, Nuffield Department of Rheumatology, Musculoskeletal and Orthopaedic Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3644-1388
AIR trial collaborators
University of Warwick · GBNuffield Orthopaedic Centre · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBWarwick Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess function, quality of life, resource use, and complications in adults treated with plaster cast immobilisation versus a removable brace for ankle fracture.

designMulticentre randomised controlled trial.

setting20 trauma units in the UK National Health Service.

participants669 adults aged 18 years and older with an acute ankle fracture suitable for cast immobilisation: 334 were randomised to a plaster cast and 335 to a removable brace.

interventionsA below the knee cast was applied and ankle range of movement exercises started on cast removal. The removable brace was fitted, and ankle range of movement exercises were started immediately.

main outcome measuresPrimary outcome was the Olerud Molander ankle score at 16 weeks, analysed by intention to treat. Secondary outcomes were Manchester-Oxford foot questionnaire, disability rating index, quality of life, and complications at 6, 10, and 16 weeks.

resultsThe mean age of participants was 46 years (SD 17 years) and 381 (57%) were women. 502 (75%) participants completed the study. No statistically significant difference was found in the Olerud Molander ankle score between the cast and removable brace groups at 16 weeks (favours brace: 1.8, 95% confidence interval -2.0 to 5.6). No clinically significant differences were found in the Olerud Molander ankle scores at other time points, in the secondary unadjusted, imputed, or per protocol analyses.

conclusionsTraditional plaster casting was not found to be superior to functional bracing in adults with an ankle fracture. No statistically difference was found in the Olerud Molander ankle score between the trial arms at 16 weeks.

trial registrationISRCTN registry ISRCTN15537280.

Indexed as

BracesCasts, SurgicalAdultAnkle FracturesExercise TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeRange of Motion, ArticularRecovery of FunctionTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID34226192
PMCPMC8256800
OpenAlexW3183126191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.