Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34225891›Full record

ArticleMaterials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications2021

Evaluation of the optimal dosage of BMP-9 through the comparison of bone regeneration induced by BMP-9 versus BMP-2 using an injectable microparticle embedded thermosensitive polymeric carrier in a rat cranial defect model.

Bipin Gaihre, Angshuman Bharadwaz, Janitha M Unagolla, Ambalangodage C Jayasuriya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. [Application progress of collagen membranes in oral medicine].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bipin GaihreBiomedical Engineering Program, Department of Bioengineering, College of Engineering, The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43607, USA.
Angshuman BharadwazBiomedical Engineering Program, Department of Bioengineering, College of Engineering, The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43607, USA.
Janitha M UnagollaBiomedical Engineering Program, Department of Bioengineering, College of Engineering, The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43607, USA.
Ambalangodage C JayasuriyaBiomedical Engineering Program, Department of Bioengineering, College of Engineering, The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43607, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine and Life Sciences, The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43614, USA. Electronic address: a.jayasuriya@utoledo.edu.

Funding

Multifunctional bone putty for craniomaxillofacial bone repairR01DE023356 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO HEALTH SCI CAMPUS · PI JAYASURIYA, AMBALANGODAGE CHAMPA · 2013 to 2017
$2.0M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE023356
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are well known as enhancers and facilitators of osteogenesis during bone regeneration. The use of recombinant BMP-2 (rhBMP-2) in bone defect healing has drawbacks, which has driven the scouting for alternatives, such as recombinant BMP-9 (rhBMP-9), to provide comparable new bone formation. However, the dosage of rhBMP-9 is quintessential for the facilitation of adequate bone defect healing. Therefore, this study has been designed to evaluate the optimal dosage of BMP-9 by comparing the bone defect healing induced by rhBMP-9 over rhBMP-2. The chitosan (CS) microparticles (MPs), coated with BMPs, were embedded in a thermoresponsive methylcellulose (MC) and calcium alginate (Alg) based injectable delivery system containing a dosage of either 0.5 μg or 1.5 μg of the respective rhBMP per bone defect. A 5 mm critical-sized cranial defect rat model has been used in this study, and bone tissues were harvested at eight weeks post-surgery. The standard tools for comparing the new bone regeneration included micro computerized tomography (micro-CT) and histological analysis. A novel perspective of analyzing the new bone quality and crystallinity was employed by using Raman spectroscopy, along with its elastic modulus quantified through Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM). Results showed that the rhBMP-9 administered at a dosage of 1.5 μg per bone defect, using this delivery system, can adequately facilitate the bone void filling with ample new bone mineralization and crystallinity as compared to rhBMP-2, thus approving the hypothesis for a viable rhBMP-2 alternative.

Indexed as

Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2Growth Differentiation Factor 2AnimalsBone Morphogenetic ProteinsBone RegenerationCalcification, PhysiologicOsteogenesisRatsRecombinant ProteinsTransforming Growth Factor betaBone Morphogenetic Protein 2Bone Morphogenetic ProteinsGrowth Differentiation Factor 2Recombinant ProteinsTransforming Growth Factor betaAtomic force microscopyBone morphogenetic proteinBone regenerationMicroparticlesRaman spectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID34225891
PMCPMC8260961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.