Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34225821›Full record

ArticleTropical medicine and health2021

Presence of dogs and proximity to a wildlife reserve increase household level risk of tungiasis in Kwale, Kenya.

Peter S Larson, Masanobu Ono, Mwatasa Changoma, Kensuke Goto, Satoshi Kaneko, Kazuhiko Moji, Noboru Minakawa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical medicine and health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Peter S Larson *Nagasaki University Institute of Tropical Medicine-Kenya Medical Research Institute (NUITM-KEMRI) project, Kenya, Nagasaki, Nagasaki, Japan. anfangen@umich.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6621-7902
Masanobu Ono *Nagasaki University Institute of Tropical Medicine-Kenya Medical Research Institute (NUITM-KEMRI) project, Kenya, Nagasaki, Nagasaki, Japan.
Mwatasa ChangomaNagasaki University Institute of Tropical Medicine-Kenya Medical Research Institute (NUITM-KEMRI) project, Kenya, Nagasaki, Nagasaki, Japan.
Kensuke GotoDivision of Health and Safety Sciences Education, Osaka Kyoiku University, Osaka, Japan.
Satoshi KanekoNagasaki University Institute of Tropical Medicine-Kenya Medical Research Institute (NUITM-KEMRI) project, Kenya, Nagasaki, Nagasaki, Japan.
Kazuhiko MojiNagasaki University School of Tropical Medicine and Global Health (TMGH), Nagasaki, Japan.
Noboru MinakawaNagasaki University Institute of Tropical Medicine-Kenya Medical Research Institute (NUITM-KEMRI) project, Kenya, Nagasaki, Nagasaki, Japan.
Kenya Medical Research Institute · KEMichigan Department of Natural Resources · USNagasaki University · JPOsaka Kyoiku University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTungiasis is a ectopic skin disease caused by some species of fleas in the Tunga genus, most notably T. penetrans. The disease afflicts poor and marginalized communities in developing countries. Transmission of tungiasis comprises a complex web of factors including domesticated animals and wildlife. This research explores animal and environmental risk factors for tungiasis in an area adjacent to a wildlife reserve in Kwale, Kenya.

methodsA two-stage complex sampling strategy was used. Households were selected from three areas in and around Kwale Town, Kenya, an area close to the Kenyan Coast. Households were listed as positive if at least one member had tungiasis. Each household was administered a questionnaire regarding tungiasis behaviors, domesticated animal assets, and wild animal species that frequent the peridomiciliary area. Associations of household tungiasis were tests with household and environmental variables using regression methods.

resultsThe study included 319 households. Of these, 41 (12.85%) were found to have at least one person who had signs of tungiasis. There were 295 (92.48%) households that possessed at least one species of domesticated animal. It was reported that wildlife regularly come into the vicinity of the home 90.59% of households. Presence of dogs around the home (OR 3.85; 95% CI 1.84; 8.11) and proximity to the park were associated with increased risk for tungiasis infestation in humans in a multivariate regression model.

conclusionsHuman tungiasis is a complex disease associated with domesticated and wild animals. Canines in particular appear to be important determinants of household level risk.

Indexed as

SurveyTungiasisWildlifeZoonosis

Identifiers

PMID34225821
PMCPMC8256484
OpenAlexW3178742425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.