Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34225820›Full record

ReviewImplementation science communications2021

Costs of implementing community-based intervention for HIV testing in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review.

Florida Uzoaru, Ucheoma Nwaozuru, Jason J Ong, Felix Obi, Chisom Obiezu-Umeh, Joseph D Tucker, Thembekile Shato, Stacey L Mason, Victoria Carter, Sunita Manu and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Implementation science communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Florida UzoaruCollege of Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St Louis, MO, USA. florida.uzoaru@slu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7507-6809
Ucheoma NwaozuruCollege of Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St Louis, MO, USA.
Jason J OngDepartment of Clinical Research and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Felix ObiHealth Policy Research Group, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria.
Chisom Obiezu-UmehCollege of Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St Louis, MO, USA.
Joseph D TuckerDivision of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
Thembekile ShatoCollege of Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St Louis, MO, USA.
Stacey L MasonCollege of Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St Louis, MO, USA.
Victoria CarterCollege of Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St Louis, MO, USA.
Sunita ManuCollege of Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St Louis, MO, USA.
Rhonda BeLueCollege of Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St Louis, MO, USA.
Oliver EzechiClinical Sciences Department, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Lagos, Nigeria.
Juliet IwelunmorCollege of Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St Louis, MO, USA.

Funding

ITEST: Innovative Tools to Expand Youth-Friendly HIV Self-TestingUG3HD096929 · NICHD · SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY · PI EZECHI, OLIVER CHUKWUJEKWU, IWELUNMOR, JULIET · 2018 to 2019
$2.3M
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development 1UG3HD096929-01NICHD NIH HHS UG3 HD096929
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity-based interventions (CBIs) are interventions aimed at improving the well-being of people in a community. CBIs for HIV testing seek to increase the availability of testing services to populations that have been identified as at high risk by reaching them in homes, schools, or community centers. However, evidence for a detailed cost analysis of these community-based interventions in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is limited. We conducted a systematic review of the cost analysis of HIV testing interventions in SSA.

methodsKeyword search was conducted on SCOPUS, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Global Health databases. Three categories of key terms used were cost (implementation cost OR cost-effectiveness OR cost analysis OR cost-benefit OR marginal cost), intervention (HIV testing), and region (sub-Saharan Africa OR sub-Saharan Africa OR SSA). CBI studies were included if they primarily focused on HIV testing, was implemented in SSA, and used micro-costing or ingredients approach.

resultsWe identified 1533 citations. After screening, ten studies were included in the review: five from East Africa and five from Southern Africa. Two studies conducted cost-effectiveness analysis, and one study was a cost-utility analysis. The remainder seven studies were cost analyses. Four intervention types were identified: HIV self-testing (HIVST), home-based, mobile, and Provider Initiated Testing and Counseling. Commonly costed resources included personnel (n = 9), materials and equipment (n = 6), and training (n = 5). Cost outcomes reported included total intervention cost (n = 9), cost per HIV test (n = 9), cost per diagnosis (n = 5), and cost per linkage to care (n = 3). Overall, interventions were implemented at a higher cost than controls, with the largest cost difference with HIVST compared to facility-based testing.

conclusionTo better inform policy, there is an urgent need to evaluate the costs associated with implementing CBIs in SSA. It is important for cost reports to be detailed, uniform, and informed by economic evaluation guidelines. This approach minimizes biases that may lead decision-makers to underestimate the resources required to scale up, sustain, or reproduce successful interventions in other settings. In an evolving field of implementation research, this review contributes to current resources on implementation cost studies.

Indexed as

Economic evaluationHIV testingImplementation cost

Identifiers

PMID34225820
PMCPMC8259076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.