ArticleBMC public health2021
Patterns of use and perceived value of social media for population health among population health stakeholders: a cross-sectional web-based survey.
Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association Between Social Media Use and Patients' Choice of Medical Practitioners Among the General Population in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Social networking sites use and life satisfaction: a moderated mediation model of e-health literacy, fatigue, uncertainty, and stress.BMC psychology · 2025Article
- From Engagement to Concerns: Social Media Use Among a Sample of Australian Public Health Professionals.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025Article
- What are patients asking and reading online? An analysis of online patient searches about treatments for developmental dysplasia of the hip.Journal of children's orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Clicks for credit: an analysis of healthcare professionals' social media use and potential for continuing professional development activities.Medical education online · 2024Article
- Rapid, Tailored Dietary and Health Education Through A Social Media Chatbot Microintervention: Development and Usability Study With Practical Recommendations.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Social Media Influencers, Health Literacy, and Food Literacy: A Correlational Study Among Adolescents.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- Assessment of the impact of social media addiction on psychosocial behaviour like depression, stress, and anxiety in working professionals.BMC psychology · 2024Article
- An Investigation of the Effectiveness of Distance Learning on Nutrition Quality of Hemodialysis Patients during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Single-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of caring sciences · 2024Article
- Patient Perception and Self-Reported Outcomes with Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses (PCIOLs): A Social Media Listening Study.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2024Article
- Beyond Hypoglossal Hype: Social Media Perspectives on the Inspire Upper Airway Stimulation System.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Modern internet search analytics and spine: what are patients asking and reading online?North American Spine Society journal · 2023Article
- Social Media Use Among Members of the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society: Results of a Web-Based Survey.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- A study to assess the efficacy of print and digital health communication media tools (HCMT) in rural and urban communities.F1000Research · 2023Article
- Article
- Kidney Nutrition in the Era of Social Media: Bridging the Gap of Nutrition Education and Kidney Health Literacy by Leveraging Resources of Social Networking.Journal of renal nutrition : the official journal of the Council on Renal Nutrition of the National Kidney Foundation · 2022Article
- Patients with rheumatic diseases are ready to use social media in clinical practice; what about rheumatologists? A cross-sectional survey.Rheumatology international · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough existing studies have described patterns of social media use in healthcare, most are focused on health professionals in one discipline. Population health requires a multi-disciplinary approach to ensure diversity and to include diverse stakeholders. To date, what is known about using social media in population health is focused on its potential as a communication tool. This study aims to investigate patterns of use and perceived value of social media usage among stakeholders in population health practice, policy, or research.
methodsWe conducted a web-based survey of delegates attending the Singapore Population Health Conversations and Workshop. We designed a 24-item questionnaire to assess 1) social media use in terms of type of platform and frequency of use; 2) perceptions of social media relevance and impact on population health; and 3) top three areas in population health that would benefit from social media. We used descriptive and logistic regression analyses to assess the relationships between variables.
resultsOf the 308 survey respondents, 97.7% reported that they use social media in some form. Messaging (96.8%) was the most dominant activity when using social media. Challenges in implementing social media for population health were time investment by health care professionals (56.2%) and patient adoption (52.9%). The top three population health areas that would benefit most from using social media were the promotion of healthy behaviors (60.7%), community engagement (47.7%), and preventive care (40.6%). Older respondents (> = 40 years) were less likely to view social media as useful for the promotion of healthy behaviors (OR = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.19-0.60). Non-social/healthcare professionals were more likely to consider social media to be useful for community engagement (OR = 1.74; 95% CI: 1.10-2.76). For preventive care, older respondents (OR = 0.51; 95% CI: 0.32-0.82) and non-social/healthcare professionals were less likely to view social media as useful (OR = 0.61; 95% CI: 0.38-0.97).
conclusionsOur findings suggest that it may be important to select the specific care areas that would benefit most from using social media. The time investment needed by population health professionals should be fully addressed in planning to maximize the application and potential value of social media.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.