Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34225665›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2021

Performance of Web tools for predicting changes in protein stability caused by mutations.

Anna Marabotti, Eugenio Del Prete, Bernardina Scafuri, Angelo Facchiano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Effect of the Lys62Ala Mutation on the Thermal Stability ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. HomozygousHuman mutation · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anna MarabottiDepartment of Chemistry and Biology "A. Zambelli", University of Salerno, Fisciano, SA, Italy. amarabotti@unisa.it.
Eugenio Del PreteCNR-IAC, National Research Council, Institute for Applied Mathematics "Mauro Picone", Naples, Italy.
Bernardina ScafuriDepartment of Chemistry and Biology "A. Zambelli", University of Salerno, Fisciano, SA, Italy.
Angelo FacchianoCNR-ISA, National Research Council, Institute of Food Science, Avellino, Italy. angelo.facchiano@isa.cnr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7077-4912

Funding

Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca PRIN2017 2017483NH8
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite decades on developing dedicated Web tools, it is still difficult to predict correctly the changes of the thermodynamic stability of proteins caused by mutations. Here, we assessed the reliability of five recently developed Web tools, in order to evaluate the progresses in the field.

resultsThe results show that, although there are improvements in the field, the assessed predictors are still far from ideal. Prevailing problems include the bias towards destabilizing mutations, and, in general, the results are unreliable when the mutation causes a ΔΔG within the interval ± 0.5 kcal/mol. We found that using several predictors and combining their results into a consensus is a rough, but effective way to increase reliability of the predictions.

conclusionsWe suggest all developers to consider in their future tools the usage of balanced data sets for training of predictors, and all users to combine the results of multiple tools to increase the chances of having correct predictions about the effect of mutations on the thermodynamic stability of a protein.

Indexed as

ProteinsMutationProtein StabilityReproducibility of ResultsThermodynamicsProteinsPredictionsProtein mutationsProtein stabilityRare diseasesStatistical analysis

Identifiers

PMID34225665
PMCPMC8256537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.