Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34225577›Full record

ReviewGut microbes

"Driver-passenger" bacteria and their metabolites in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer.

Marion Avril, R William DePaolo

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gut microbes. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Microbiome-Genome Crosstalk in Colorectal Cancer: Colibactin Signatures andInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. The evolving story ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  13. Modeling Fusobacterium nucleatum-Driven Colorectal Cancer in Apc-Mutant Mice.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Marion AvrilDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
R William DePaoloDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3880-4544
University of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant public health problem accounting for about 10% of all new cancer cases globally. Though genetic and epigenetic factors influence CRC, the gut microbiota acts as a significant component of the disease's etiology. Further research is still needed to clarify the specific roles and identify more bacteria related to CRC development. This review aims to provide an overview of the "driver-passenger" model of CRC. The colonization and active invasion of the "driver(s)" bacteria cause damages allowing other commensals, known as "passengers," or their by-products, i.e., metabolites, to pass through the epithelium . This review will not only focus on the species of bacteria implicated in this model but also on their biological functions implicated in the occurrence of CRC, such as forming biofilms, mucus, penetration and production of enterotoxins and genotoxins.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeBacteriaBiomarkers, TumorCarcinogenesisColorectal NeoplasmsDisease ProgressionHumansBiomarkers, TumorbiofilmColorectal cancerdriver-passengermetabolitesmicrobiomemucus

Identifiers

PMID34225577
PMCPMC8265790
OpenAlexW3182830011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.