Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34225133›Full record

ArticleVision research2021

The magnitude of monocular light attenuation required to elicit the Pulfrich illusion.

C Vijay Reena Durai, Siddhart Rajendran, Michael A Webster, Sandeep Vempati, Shrikant R Bharadwaj

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vision research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 59% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Motion Misperception in Anisomyopia Before and After Optical Correction.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C Vijay Reena DuraiBrien Holden Institute of Optometry and Vision Sciences, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Road no. 2, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad 500034, Telangana, India; Prof. Brien Holden Eye Research Centre, Hyderabad Eye Research Foundation, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Road no. 2, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad 500034, Telangana, India.
Siddhart RajendranDepartment of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, USA.
Michael A WebsterDepartment of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, USA.
Sandeep VempatiCenter for Innovation, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad 500034, Telangana, India.
Shrikant R BharadwajBrien Holden Institute of Optometry and Vision Sciences, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Road no. 2, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad 500034, Telangana, India; Prof. Brien Holden Eye Research Centre, Hyderabad Eye Research Foundation, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Road no. 2, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad 500034, Telangana, India. Electronic address: bharadwaj@lvpei.org.
University of Nevada, Reno · US

Funding

SALIENCE, ADAPTATION, AND NATURAL IMAGE STATISTICSR01EY010834 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI WEBSTER, MICHAEL A · 2000 to 2023
$4.6M
COLOR CONTRAST ADAPTATIONR29EY010834 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI WEBSTER, MICHAEL A · 1995 to 1999
–
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY010834NEI NIH HHS R29 EY010834
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the Pulfrich illusion, the depth of a moving object is misperceived due to induced retinal disparity and/or interocular velocity differences arising from differences in luminance, contrast, or spatial frequency between the two eyes. These effects have been shown to occur both for visual deficits and for optical corrections that introduce significant binocular differences between the retinal images. However, it remains unknown to what extent the illusion might arise given normal variation between the eyes, such as natural interocular variation in pupil diameter (anisocoria). To assess this, we examined the threshold interocular retinal illuminance difference required to experience illusory depth in two random-dot fields moving in opposite directions in 24 normally-sighted observers with dilated pupils. Interocular difference in retinal illuminance was induced by placing neutral density filters of different intensities before the left eye. A minority of subjects (n = 8) did not provide meaningful data on changes in the experience of illusory depth with interocular difference in retinal illuminance and four subjects showed biases >±10% from the 50% point of subjective equality in the psychometric function. For the remaining 12 participants, the retinal illuminance had to differ by approximately 40% for the depth between the planes to become visible at threshold levels. This difference was approximately constant over a range of absolute luminance levels from 10 to 80 cd/m

Indexed as

IllusionsMotion PerceptionDepth PerceptionHumansLightRetinaVision, BinocularVision DisparityAnisocoriaBinocular disparityDepthPupilRetinal IlluminanceTransmission latencies

Identifiers

PMID34225133
PMCPMC8363548
OpenAlexW3178052374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.