ArticleMedical image analysis2021
ABCnet: Adversarial bias correction network for infant brain MR images.
Article in Medical image analysis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current development and prospects of deep learning in spine image analysis: a literature review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022Review
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging Segmentation via Weighted Level Set Model Based on Local Kernel Metric and Spatial Constraint.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity (also termed as the bias correction) is an essential step in brain MR image analysis. Existing methods are typically developed for adult brain MR images based on the assumption that the image intensities within the same brain tissue are relatively uniform. However, this assumption is not valid in infant brain MR images, due to the dynamic and regionally-heterogeneous image contrast and appearance changes, which are caused by the underlying spatiotemporally-nonuniform myelination process. Therefore, it is not appropriate to directly use existing methods to correct the infant brain MR images. In this paper, we propose an end-to-end 3D adversarial bias correction network (ABCnet), tailored for direct prediction of bias fields from the input infant brain MR images for bias correction. The "ground-truth" bias fields for training our network are carefully defined by an improved N4 method, which integrates manually-corrected tissue segmentation maps as anatomical prior knowledge. The whole network is trained alternatively by minimizing generative and adversarial losses. To handle the heterogeneous intensity changes, our generative loss includes a tissue-aware local intensity uniformity term to reduce the local intensity variation in the corrected image. Besides, it also integrates two additional terms to enhance the smoothness of the estimated bias field and to improve the robustness of the proposed method, respectively. Comprehensive experiments with different sizes of training datasets have been carried out on a total of 1492 T1w and T2w MR images from neonates, infants, and adults, respectively. Both qualitative and quantitative evaluations on simulated and real datasets consistently demonstrate the superior performance of our ABCnet in both accuracy and efficiency, compared with popularly available methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.