Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34225011›Full record

ArticleMedical image analysis2021

ABCnet: Adversarial bias correction network for infant brain MR images.

Liangjun Chen, Zhengwang Wu, Dan Hu, Fan Wang, J Keith Smith, Weili Lin, Li Wang, Dinggang Shen, Gang Li, For Unc/Umn Baby Connectome Project Consortium

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical image analysis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Liangjun ChenDepartment of Radiology and BRIC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Zhengwang WuDepartment of Radiology and BRIC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Dan HuDepartment of Radiology and BRIC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Fan WangDepartment of Radiology and BRIC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
J Keith SmithDepartment of Radiology and BRIC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Weili LinDepartment of Radiology and BRIC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Li WangDepartment of Radiology and BRIC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Dinggang ShenDepartment of Radiology and BRIC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Gang LiDepartment of Radiology and BRIC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. Electronic address: gang_li@med.unc.edu.
For Unc/Umn Baby Connectome Project ConsortiumDepartment of Radiology and BRIC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

Funding

UNC/UMN Baby Connectome ProjectU01MH110274 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ELISON, JED THOMAS, GILMORE, JOHN HORACE · 2016 to 2019
$4.5M
Continued Development of Infant Brain Analysis ToolsR01MH117943 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LI, GANG, WANG, LI · 2018 to 2022
$2.3M
Parcellating Infant Cerebral Cortex based on Developmental Patterns of Multimodal MRIR01MH116225 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LI, GANG · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
Harmonizing and Archiving of Large-scale Infant Neuroimaging DataRF1MH123202 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LI, GANG · 2021 to 2021
$627k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH116225NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH117943NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH123202NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH110274
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity (also termed as the bias correction) is an essential step in brain MR image analysis. Existing methods are typically developed for adult brain MR images based on the assumption that the image intensities within the same brain tissue are relatively uniform. However, this assumption is not valid in infant brain MR images, due to the dynamic and regionally-heterogeneous image contrast and appearance changes, which are caused by the underlying spatiotemporally-nonuniform myelination process. Therefore, it is not appropriate to directly use existing methods to correct the infant brain MR images. In this paper, we propose an end-to-end 3D adversarial bias correction network (ABCnet), tailored for direct prediction of bias fields from the input infant brain MR images for bias correction. The "ground-truth" bias fields for training our network are carefully defined by an improved N4 method, which integrates manually-corrected tissue segmentation maps as anatomical prior knowledge. The whole network is trained alternatively by minimizing generative and adversarial losses. To handle the heterogeneous intensity changes, our generative loss includes a tissue-aware local intensity uniformity term to reduce the local intensity variation in the corrected image. Besides, it also integrates two additional terms to enhance the smoothness of the estimated bias field and to improve the robustness of the proposed method, respectively. Comprehensive experiments with different sizes of training datasets have been carried out on a total of 1492 T1w and T2w MR images from neonates, infants, and adults, respectively. Both qualitative and quantitative evaluations on simulated and real datasets consistently demonstrate the superior performance of our ABCnet in both accuracy and efficiency, compared with popularly available methods.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultBrainHumansInfantInfant, NewbornGenerative adversarial networks (GANs)InfantIntensity nonuniformityMRI

Identifiers

PMID34225011
PMCPMC8316417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.