Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34224635›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2021

The COVID-19 pandemic and reproductive genetic counseling: Changes in access and service delivery at an academic medical center in the United States.

Caitlin Mann, Brighton Goodhue, Arianna Guillard, Jill Slamon, Randa Newman, Zhiguo Zhao, Tan Ding, Gianna Petrelli, Martha Dudek

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Assessing genetic counseling efficiency with natural language processing.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Caitlin MannDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2647-790X
Brighton GoodhueDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Arianna GuillardDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Jill SlamonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Randa NewmanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Zhiguo ZhaoDepartment of Biostatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Tan DingDepartment of Biostatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Gianna PetrelliMaster's in Genetic Counseling Program, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.
Martha DudekDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic widely disrupted the delivery of healthcare services, including genetic counseling. To ensure continuity of care, the reproductive genetic counselors at a large academic medical center in the United States rapidly transitioned their practice from 90% in-person patient consultations to a predominantly telehealth model. The present study describes this transition in regard to patient access to genetic counseling and genetic screening. A chart review of patients seen by the reproductive genetic counselors from January 2020 to August 2020 was completed. The time frame included the three months prior to the COVID-19 pandemic and the first five months during COVID-19. Patient demographics and clinical and appointment data were compared between the pre-COVID-19 and during-COVID-19 timeframes. Overall, 88.6% of patients were seen via telehealth during COVID-19 and there was no significant difference based upon patient age (p = .20), indication for appointment (p = .06), or gestational age (p = .06). However, non-English speaking patients were more often seen in-person than by telehealth (p < .001), and more patients residing farther from the clinic were seen via telehealth (p = .004). During-COVID-19 results for prenatal cell-free DNA screening and expanded carrier screening were delayed (p < .001). Additionally, after consenting to screening, patients seen during COVID-19 were more likely to not complete a sample collection for their intended screening when compared to those seen pre-COVID-19 (OR = 6.15, 95% CI = 1.43-26.70, p = .015). Overall, this study supports that access to genetic counseling services and genetic screening can be maintained during a global pandemic like COVID-19. Genetic counselors are well-equipped to pivot swiftly during challenging times; however, they must continue to work to address other barriers to accessing genetic services, especially for non-English speaking populations. Future studies are needed to pose solutions to the obstacles confronted in this service delivery model during a global pandemic.

Indexed as

Academic Medical CentersCOVID-19FemaleGenetic CounselingHumansPandemicsPregnancyTelemedicineTennesseeCOVID-19genetic counselinggenetic counselorsgenetic servicesprenatal genetic counselingservice delivery modelstelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID34224635
PMCPMC8426661
OpenAlexW3178127129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.