Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34224467›Full record

ReviewAsia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.)2021

Artificial Intelligence in Cornea, Refractive Surgery, and Cataract: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications, and Future Directions.

Radhika Rampat, Rashmi Deshmukh, Xin Chen, Daniel S W Ting, Dalia G Said, Harminder S Dua, Darren S J Ting

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Asia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06332703 (Acanthamoeba and Artificial Intelligence), which is not on this map. Cited by 48 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06332703 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Acanthamoeba and Artificial Intelligence: Single-center Retrospective Observational Study

TypeobservationalSponsorIRCCS Ospedale San RaffaeleRan2024 to 2025Enrolled151ConditionsAcanthamoeba Keratitis, Artificial Intelligence
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Artificial Intelligence in Cataract Surgery: A Systematic Review.Translational vision science & technology · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Radhika RampatMoorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK.
Rashmi DeshmukhDepartment of Ophthalmology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Xin ChenSchool of Computer Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Daniel S W TingDuke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Dalia G SaidAcademic Ophthalmology, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Harminder S DuaAcademic Ophthalmology, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Darren S J TingSingapore National Eye Center / Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/T001674/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractCorneal diseases, uncorrected refractive errors, and cataract represent the major causes of blindness globally. The number of refractive surgeries, either cornea- or lens-based, is also on the rise as the demand for perfect vision continues to increase. With the recent advancement and potential promises of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies demonstrated in the realm of ophthalmology, particularly retinal diseases and glaucoma, AI researchers and clinicians are now channeling their focus toward the less explored ophthalmic areas related to the anterior segment of the eye. Conditions that rely on anterior segment imaging modalities, including slit-lamp photography, anterior segment optical coherence tomography, corneal tomography, in vivo confocal microscopy and/or optical biometers, are the most commonly explored areas. These include infectious keratitis, keratoconus, corneal grafts, ocular surface pathologies, preoperative screening before refractive surgery, intraocular lens calculation, and automated refraction, among others. In this review, we aimed to provide a comprehensive update on the utilization of AI in anterior segment diseases, with particular emphasis on the recent advancement in the past few years. In addition, we demystify some of the basic principles and terminologies related to AI, particularly machine learning and deep learning, to help improve the understanding, research and clinical implementation of these AI technologies among the ophthalmologists and vision scientists. As we march toward the era of digital health, guidelines such as CONSORT-AI, SPIRIT-AI, and STARD-AI will play crucial roles in guiding and standardizing the conduct and reporting of AI-related trials, ultimately promoting their potential for clinical translation.

Indexed as

CataractOphthalmologyRefractive Surgical ProceduresArtificial IntelligenceCorneaHumansKeratoconus

Identifiers

PMID34224467
PMCPMC7611495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.