ReviewCurrent opinion in cardiology2021
Mobile health in preventive cardiology: current status and future perspective.
Review in Current opinion in cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Added Technology for Weight Management in Cardiac Rehabilitation: Biopsychosocial Factors and Rehabilitees' Talk in a Mixed Method Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Trial
- Efficacy of supermarket and web-based interventions for improving dietary quality: a randomized, controlled trial.Nature medicine · 2022Trial
- Lifestyle Medicine and Cardiovascular Health.American journal of lifestyle medicine · 2026Review
- Cardiovascular Wellness-The Role of Lifestyle and Health Equity: A Perspective.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Quantifying the association of Life's Crucial 9 with cardiovascular diseases among elderly hypertensive patients managed in primary care settings.Population health metrics · 2025Article
- Role of Mobile Health and Wearable Devices in Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: A Comprehensive Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Acceptance, Needs, and Demands for Nutritional mHealth Support in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease.Nutrients · 2024Article
- Technological Interventions to Implement Prevention and Health Promotion in Cardiovascular Patients.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Mobile Health Interventions: A Frontier for Mitigating the Global Burden of Cardiovascular Disease.Cureus · 2024Review
- Advancing telemedicine in cardiology: A comprehensive review of evolving practices and outcomes in a postpandemic context.Cardiovascular digital health journal · 2024Review
- Impact of Wearable Technology on Heart Failure Management.Galen medical journal · 2024Review
- Mapping Factors That Affect the Uptake of Digital Therapeutics Within Health Systems: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Improving Predictability and Effectiveness in Preventive Digital Health Interventions: Scoping Review.Interactive journal of medical research · 2023Article
- Racial and Ethnic Disparities in All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality Among Cancer Patients in the U.S.JACC. CardioOncology · 2023Article
- Editorial: Future trends and directions of using mHealth strategies to prevent and treat cardiovascular diseases.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Associations of Demographic, Socioeconomic, and Cognitive Characteristics With Mobile Health Access: MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis).Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022Observational
- Review
- Article
- A New Metric for Promoting Cardiovascular Health: Life's Essential 8.The Journal of cardiovascular nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewDespite cutting edge acute interventions and growing preventive strategies supported by robust clinical trials, cardiovascular disease (CVD) has stubbornly persisted as a leading cause of death in the United States and globally. The American Heart Association recognizes mobile health technologies (mHealth) as an emerging strategy in the mitigation of CVD risk factors, with significant potential for improving population health. The purpose of this review is to highlight and summarize the latest available literature on mHealth applications and provide perspective on future directions and barriers to implementation. RECENT
findingsWhile available randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews tend to support efficacy of mHealth, published literature includes heterogenous approaches to similar problems with inconsistent results. Some of the strongest recent evidence has been focused on the use of wearables in arrhythmia detection. Systematic reviews of mHealth approaches demonstrate benefit when applied to risk factor modification in diabetes, cigarette smoking cessation, and physical activity/weight loss, while also showing promise in multi risk factor modification via cardiac rehabilitation. SUMMARY: Evidence supports efficacy of mHealth in a variety of applications for CVD prevention and management, but continued work is needed for further validation and scaling. Future directions will focus on platform optimization, data and sensor consolidation, and clinical workflow integration. Barriers include application heterogeneity, lack of reimbursement structures, and inequitable access to technology. Policies to promote access to technology will be critical to evidence-based mHealth technologies reaching diverse populations and advancing health equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.