Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34224061›Full record

SynthesisTargeted oncology2021

Risk of Infection with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Fausto Petrelli, Anna Maria Morelli, Andrea Luciani, Antonio Ghidini, Cinzia Solinas

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Targeted oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Systemic treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced psoriasis: Inference-based guidance.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Simultaneous Durvalumab and Platinum-Based Chemoradiotherapy in Unresectable Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: The Phase III PACIFIC-2 Study.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. A prospective clinical study on the effectiveness ofJournal of traditional and complementary medicine · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Crossing the Barrier:Microorganisms · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Fausto Petrelli *Oncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, BG, Italy.
Anna Maria Morelli *Medical Oncology, ASL TO3 Ospedale degli Infermi, Rivoli, TO, Italy.
Andrea LucianiOncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, BG, Italy.
Antonio GhidiniOncology Unit, Casa di Cura Igea, Milan, Italy.
Cinzia SolinasMedical Oncology, ATS Sardegna, Via Mannironi, 24047, Nuoro, NU, Italy. czsolinas@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6782-8708
Azienda Ospedaliera Treviglio · ITATS Sardegna (Italy) · ITCasa di Cura Columbus · ITOspedale degli Infermi · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe relative risk (RR) of infection for patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is unknown.

objectivesThis study evaluated the risk of infection for patients with solid tumors undergoing ICI therapy based on a systematic review and meta-analysis. PATIENTS AND

methodsThe Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Pubmed databases were searched up to 1 December 2020. Randomized trials comparing any ICI alone, with chemotherapy (CT), or with other agents versus placebo, CT, or other agents were included. Three independent reviewers extracted the data. The primary outcome was the RR of all-grade (G) and G3-5 infections for patients receiving ICI-based treatments. Random or fixed-effect models were used according to statistical heterogeneity.

resultsA total of 21,451 patients from N = 36 studies were eligible. ICIs were associated with a similar risk of all-grade infections (RR = 1.02; 95% CI 0.84-1.24; P = 0.85) versus non-ICI treatments (G1-5 events: 9.6 versus 8.3%). When the ICIs alone were compared to CT, their use was associated with 42% less risk of all-grade infections (RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.4-0.85; P = 0.01). Compared to CT, the combination of ICIs and CT increased the risk of all-grade (RR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.23-1.53; P < 0.01) and severe infections (RR = 1.52, 95% CI 1.17-1.96; P < 0.01). In anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, anti-CTLA-4, monotherapy, and combination trials, the RR of all-grade infections was 0.72 (95% CI 0.49-1.05; P = 0.09), 1.18 (95% CI 0.95-1.46; P = 0.13), 1.74 (95% CI 1.13-2.67; P = 0.01), 0.97 (95% CI 0.79-1.19; P = 0.75) and 2.26 (95% CI 1.34-3.8; P < 0.01), respectively.

conclusionsCompared to CT alone, ICIs were safer and are recommended for frail patients. Conversely, CT + ICIs or ICIs combinations increased infection risk. Further studies are required to identify high-risk patients and evaluate the need for CT dose reduction or prophylactic myeloid growth factors.

Indexed as

Immune Checkpoint InhibitorsNeoplasmsHumansImmune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID34224061
PMCPMC8256230
OpenAlexW3182799765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.