Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34223988›Full record

ArticleInternational archives of occupational and environmental health2022

Comparison of the work ability index and the work ability score for predicting health-related quality of life.

Hamidreza Mokarami, Rosanna Cousins, Haji Omid Kalteh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Health-related quality of life of unemployed individuals diagnosed with a mental illness: a cross-sectional study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Individual Work Attitudes and Work Ability.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Factors associated with self-reported work ability among people with multiple sclerosis in Sweden.Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hamidreza MokaramiDepartment of Ergonomics, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Rosanna CousinsDepartment of Psychology, Liverpool Hope University, Liverpool, UK.
Haji Omid KaltehDepartment of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran. h.omid@mazums.ac.ir.
Liverpool Hope University · GBMazandaran University of Medical Sciences · IRShiraz University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

Shiraz University of Medical Sciences IR.SUMS.REC.1399.250
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the relationship of the 7-item Work Ability Index (WAI) and the single-item Work Ability Score (WAS) with individual and work-related factors, and to investigate the predictive role of these two work ability assessments for health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

methodsThis is a cross-sectional study. 407 of 445 employees working on a construction project in Shiraz, Iran consented to participate in an anonymous survey. 381 surveys were returned completed. Correlation analyses were used to evaluate relationships between WAI and WAS, and the total score and four domains of the WHOQOL-BREF, our measure of HRQOL, and individual and work-related variables. Hierarchical multivariate linear regression analyses were performed to compare WAI and WAS in predicting HRQOL and its four dimensions.

resultsWAI and WAS were both significant predictors of HRQOL and its four dimensions and the explained variance was very similar. The WAI and WAS explained 46% and 44% of the variance related to the HRQOL, respectively. WAI and WAS explained 36-38% and 35-37% of the variance related to dimensions of the HRQOL, respectively. There were significant relationships of both WAS and WAI with job type, work schedule, smoking, and exercise habit.

conclusionsThe WAS and WAI showed a very similar relationship with participants' individual and work-related factors and HRQOL. The Work Ability Score is a valid and suitable measure for assessment of work ability among Iranian workers. Use of this simple measure could be advantageous to reduce demands on research participants and in workability assessments.

Indexed as

Occupational HealthQuality of LifeCross-Sectional StudiesHumansIranSurveys and QuestionnairesWork Capacity EvaluationAgeing workerConstruction workersErgonomicsHeath-related quality of lifeOccupational health

Identifiers

PMID34223988
OpenAlexW3181771224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.