Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34223968›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2022

Retained metal fragments following esophageal button battery impaction.

Dotan Yogev, Raffi Lev-Tzion, Oren Ledder, Esther Orlanski-Meyer, Elena Zharkov, Ruth Cytter-Kuint

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dotan Yogev *Juliet Keidan Institute of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2431-0284
Raffi Lev-Tzion *Juliet Keidan Institute of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Oren LedderJuliet Keidan Institute of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Esther Orlanski-MeyerJuliet Keidan Institute of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Elena ZharkovDepartment of Radiology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Ruth Cytter-KuintFaculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel. rcytter@szmc.org.il.
Hebrew University of Jerusalem · ILShaare Zedek Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Button battery (BB) impaction in the esophagus requires immediate endoscopic removal and meticulous follow-up, including serial cross-sectional imaging, preferably with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, BBs quickly degrade in the esophagus, and metallic fragments may remain in the injured mucosa following removal. This metallic debris can cause thermal injury during MRI, potentially aggravating local injury. We aimed to explore whether such metallic fragments could be identified on imaging following BB removal. In this study, we conducted a retrospective review of children (0-18 years) presenting with BB impaction in the esophagus between 2014 and 2020. Endoscopy reports and imaging studies were blindly reviewed by a pediatric gastroenterologist and a pediatric radiologist. Of 161 cases of battery ingestion, 14 (8%) underwent endoscopy, and in 9 (5%) a BB was impacted in the esophagus. The median time from ingestion to BB removal was 8 h (range 2-48 h). The median time from removal to CT was 44 h (range 0.5-104 h). BB appearance ranged from mild corrosion to visible debris. Pre-removal plain films showed irregular battery contour suggesting corrosion (5/7 plain films). In 7/9 CT scans (78%), high-attenuation esophageal content (median 266HU (range 140-1151)), which may represent metallic debris, was identified. Five patients had a follow-up CT which still showed gradual resolution of the high-attenuation content.Conclusions: we describe a new finding on CT following BB removal which might represent metallic debris. Clinicians should be aware of these findings which potentially may be harmful during MRI used in the ongoing assessment of esophageal injury. What is Known: • Button batteries are a dangerous pediatric foreign body with potentially fatal vascular complications. What is New: • Metallic debris was identified on computerized tomography following button battery removal in most children. • We bring to attention this new finding which may affect clinical management, as minimal metallic content can cause burns during MRI.

Indexed as

Foreign BodiesChildElectric Power SuppliesEsophagusHumansInfantMagnetic Resonance ImagingRetrospective StudiesButton batteryComputerized tomographyEsophageal impactionMagnetic resonance imagingMetallic debrisThermal injury

Identifiers

PMID34223968
OpenAlexW3181446059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.