ArticleJSES international2021
Osteochondritis dissecans of the glenoid: an analysis of grades, treatment, and outcomes.
Article in JSES international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Glenoid osteochondritis dissecans in 9 baseball players: arthroscopic management and radiographic outcomes.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Article
- Arthroscopic Microfracture for Focal Glenoid Osteochondral Lesions in Young Active-Duty Military Patients: A Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Arthroscopic Single-Layer Hyaluronate-Based Scaffold for Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Glenoid.Arthroscopy techniques · 2025Article
- Surgical Management of Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Glenoid via Autologous Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate and Extracellular Matrix Graft in an Eighteen-Year-Old College Pitcher.Video journal of sports medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOsteochondritis dissecans (OCD) is an idiopathic disorder of subchondral bone that causes focal articular cartilage disruption with the potential long-term consequence of premature osteoarthritis. Glenoid OCD is exceedingly rare. This case series aims to identify the grades of glenoid OCD and report its grade-specific treatment with clinical, radiological, and functional outcomes.
methodsProspectively collected data of consecutive patients diagnosed with a symptomatic glenoid OCD, who had a minimum 2-year follow-up, following nonoperative or surgical treatment, was retrospectively analyzed. Osteochondral defects secondary to acute trauma, instability, and primary osteoarthritis were excluded. Pretreatment and posttreatment clinical, radiological, and sports participation data were collected. This included pretreatment MRI for grading of glenoid OCD according to the International Cartilage Research Society (ICRS) OCD staging system, and postoperative MRI for grading of articular cartilage repair using the MOCART (MRI observation of cartilage repair tissue) scoring system.
resultsThe study identified 7 competitive overhead athletes with symptomatic unilateral glenoid OCD, with a post-treatment minimum 2-year follow-up. Of 4 patients with ICRS OCD I, 3 healed with nonoperative treatment, whereas 1 progressed to ICRS OCD II. This patient along with another 3 patients with unstable glenoid OCD underwent arthroscopic OCD excision with bone marrow stimulation cartilage repair. All patients improved following treatment and had full passive and active range of shoulder movements, with normal strength and stability at the 2- year follow-up. The mean MOCART score on MRI at 2 years for the 4 patients who underwent surgery was 82.5 (range, 75-90). MRI documented healing in all 3 patients with ICRS OCD I who underwent nonoperative treatment. All patients returned to the same or higher level of sport following treatment, with mean time to return to sports being 8.0 months (range, 6-11 months) for nonoperative treatment, and 6.8 months (range, 5-10 months) for operative treatment. This difference was not statistically significant (
conclusionDespite the glenoid being a concave non-weight-bearing articular surface, OCD at this site has pathological grades similar to other convex weight-bearing articular surfaces. Notwithstanding the limited number of cases, it would appear that ICRS OCD I can often be successfully treated with nonoperative treatment, whereas ICRS OCD II, III, IV, warrant operative treatment. Bone marrow stimulation is a safe and predictable option for glenoid OCD cartilage repair and allows athletes a quick and successful return to sports.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.