Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34223388›Full record

ArticleResuscitation plus2021

Mixed methods feasibility study for the surviving opioid overdose with naloxone education and resuscitation (SOONER) trial.

Aaron M Orkin, Mercy Charles, Kristine Norris, Rekha Thomas, Leigh Chapman, Amy Wright, Douglas M Campbell, Curtis Handford, Michelle Klaiman, Shaun Hopkins and 12 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Resuscitation plus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03821649 (Protocol for a Mixed Methods Feasibility Study for the Surviving Opioid Overdose With Naloxone Education and Resuscitation), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03821649 nacompletednot on this map

Protocol for a Mixed Methods Feasibility Study for the Surviving Opioid Overdose With Naloxone Education and Resuscitation (SOONER) Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUnity Health TorontoRan2019 to 2020Enrolled90ConditionsOverdoseArmsSOONER Training and Naloxone Kit Kit, Community or Hospital-Based Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Aaron M OrkinLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Unity Health Toronto, 209 Victoria St, Toronto, ON M5B 1T8, Canada.
Mercy CharlesApplied Health Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Unity Health Toronto, 250 Yonge St, Toronto, ON M5G 1B1, Canada.
Kristine NorrisApplied Health Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Unity Health Toronto, 250 Yonge St, Toronto, ON M5G 1B1, Canada.
Rekha ThomasApplied Health Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Unity Health Toronto, 250 Yonge St, Toronto, ON M5G 1B1, Canada.
Leigh ChapmanPopulation Health & Social Medicine Program, University Health Network, 101 College St, Toronto, ON M5G 1L7, Canada.
Amy WrightRyerson University, 350 Victoria St, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada.
Douglas M CampbellAllan Waters Family Simulation Centre Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Unity Health Toronto, 209 Victoria St. Toronto, Ontario M5B 1T8, Canada.
Curtis HandfordDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, 61 Queen St E #3, Toronto, ON M5C 2T2, Canada.
Michelle KlaimanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond St, Toronto, ON M5B 1X1, Canada.
Shaun HopkinsToronto Public Health, 277 Victoria St, Toronto, ON M5B 2L6, Canada.
Rita ShahinToronto Public Health, 277 Victoria St, Toronto, ON M5B 2L6, Canada.
Kevin ThorpeApplied Health Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Unity Health Toronto, 250 Yonge St, Toronto, ON M5G 1B1, Canada.
Peter JüniApplied Health Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Unity Health Toronto, 250 Yonge St, Toronto, ON M5G 1B1, Canada.
Janet ParsonsApplied Health Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Unity Health Toronto, 250 Yonge St, Toronto, ON M5G 1B1, Canada.
Kate SellenDesign for Health, OCAD University, 100 McCaul St, Toronto, ON M5T 1W1, Canada.
Nick GosoDesign for Health, OCAD University, 100 McCaul St, Toronto, ON M5T 1W1, Canada.
Richard HuntDesign for Health, OCAD University, 100 McCaul St, Toronto, ON M5T 1W1, Canada.
Pamela LeeceDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, 500 University Ave, Toronto, ON M5G 1V7, Canada.
Laurie J MorrisonLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Unity Health Toronto, 209 Victoria St, Toronto, ON M5B 1T8, Canada.
Vicky StergiopoulosCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, 1000 Queen St W, Toronto, ON M6J 1H4, Canada.
Suzanne TurnerDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, 61 Queen St E #3, Toronto, ON M5C 2T2, Canada.
Carol StrikeLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Unity Health Toronto, 209 Victoria St, Toronto, ON M5B 1T8, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimWe plan to conduct a randomised clinical trial among people likely to witness opioid overdose to compare the educational effectiveness of point-of-care naloxone distribution with best-available care, by observing participants' resuscitation skills in a simulated overdose. This mixed methods feasibility study aims to assess the effectiveness of recruitment and retention strategies and acceptability of study procedures.

methodsWe implemented candidate-driven recruitment strategies with verbal consent and destigmatizing study materials in a family practice, emergency department, and addictions service. People ≥16 years of age who are likely to witness overdose were randomized to point-of-care naloxone distribution or referral to an existing program. We evaluated participant skills as a responder to a simulated overdose 3-14 days post-recruitment. Retention strategies included flexible scheduling, reminders, cash compensation and refreshments. The primary outcome was recruitment and retention feasibility, defined as the ability to recruit 28 eligible participants in 28 days, with <50% attrition at the outcome simulation. Acceptability of study procedures and motivations for participation were assessed in a semi-structured interview.

resultsWe enrolled 30 participants over 24 days, and retained 21 participants (70%, 95%CI 56.7-100). The most common motivation for participation was a desire to serve the community or loved ones in distress. Participants reported that study procedures were acceptable and that the outcome simulation provided a supportive and affirming environment.

conclusionThe planned trial is ready for implementation. Recruitment and retention is feasible and study processes are acceptable for people who are likely to witness overdose. (Registration: NCT03821649).

Indexed as

Addiction medicineBystandersEmergency medicineFeasibility trialHarm reductionOpioid overdoseOverdose education and naloxone distributionPilot trialPrehospital carePublic healthRandomized control trialResuscitationSimulationStudy recruitmentStudy retentionSubstance use

Identifiers

PMID34223388
PMCPMC8244470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.