ArticleResuscitation plus2020
Current trends and outcomes of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Japan: A nationwide observational study.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal CPR for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a trial-based Markov model with a lifetime horizon.European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care · 2026Trial
- Age-Dependent Benefit of ECPR in OHCA: An Interaction Analysis.Chonnam medical journal · 2026Article
- Wolf Creek XVIII Part 4: innovations in ECPR technology.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- Clinical Prediction Score for Patients With Initial Nonshockable Rhythm Receiving Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Development and Internal Validation.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Observational
- Characteristics of patients requiring tracheostomy following extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.Resuscitation plus · 2025Article
- Development of a health equity tool in resuscitation sciences and application to current research in extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for cardiac arrest.Resuscitation · 2025Review
- Sex differences in extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: nationwide multicenter retrospective study in Japan.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Article
- Health-related quality of life one year after refractory cardiac arrest treated with conventional or extracorporeal CPR; a secondary analysis of the INCEPTION-trial.Resuscitation plus · 2024Article
- Organ donation after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a nationwide retrospective cohort study.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Article
- The effect of restrictive versus liberal selection criteria on survival in ECPR: a retrospective analysis of a multi-regional dataset.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2023Observational
- Corticosteroid use with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A nationwide observational study.Resuscitation plus · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe present study aimed to describe the prevalence, prognosis and annual trends of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients, using a nationwide inpatient database in Japan.
methodsThis was a nationwide retrospective cohort study, using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database. We included OHCA patients registered in the database from July 2010 to March 2017 and analyzed the annual prevalence of OHCA patients who received ECPR. The outcomes included survival to hospital discharge and survival with favorable neurologic outcome at hospital discharge. The annual trends on the outcomes were also analyzed.
resultsWe identified 217,907 eligible patients. OHCA patients were divided into patients with ECPR (n = 5,612) and conventional CPR (n = 212,295). The prevalence of ECPR performed in OHCA patients was 2.6%. ECPR prevalence significantly increased from 2.1% in 2010 to 3.0% in 2016 (
conclusionsThe annual prevalence of ECPR significantly increased from 2010 to 2016. Improvements in overall survival to hospital discharge were noted for ECPR in OHCA patients and there was a trend in the tendency for ECPR patients discharged from the hospital to have favorable neurologic outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.