ArticleResuscitation plus
Evaluation of two newborn resuscitation training strategies in regional hospitals in Ghana.
Article in Resuscitation plus. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Answering the call for decolonizing global health education: a qualitative approach to educational needs assessment in a Ghanaian NICU.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Adherence to guidelines on quality neonatal resuscitation practices among healthcare professionals in Ghana: an observational study.BMJ open · 2025Observational
- The cost-effectiveness of a program to reduce intrapartum and neonatal mortality in a referral hospital in Ghana.PloS one · 2020Article
- Evaluating the Effectiveness of an Evidence-Based Practice in Neonatal Resuscitation among Birth Asphyxiated Newborns in a Developing Country.SAGE open nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimIn Ghana, institutional delivery has been emphasized to improve maternal and newborn outcomes. The Making Every Baby Count Initiative, a large coordinated training effort, aimed to improve newborn outcomes through government engagement and provider training across four regions of Ghana. Two newborn resuscitation training and evaluation approaches are described for front line newborn care providers at five regional hospitals.
methodsA modified newborn resuscitation program was taught at the Greater Accra Regional Hospital (GARH) and evaluated with real-time resuscitation observations. A programmatic shift, led to a different approach being utilized in Sunyani, Koforidua, Ho and Kumasi South Regional Hospitals. This included Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) and Essential Care for Every Baby (ECEB) training followed by objective structured clinical examinations (OSCE) with manikins at fixed intervals. Data was collected on training outcomes, fresh stillbirth and institutional newborn mortality rates.
resultsTraining was conducted for 412 newborn care providers. For 120 staff trained at GARH, resuscitation observations and chart review found improvements in conducting positive pressure ventilation. For 292 providers that received HBB and ECEB training, OSCE pass rates exceeded 90%, but follow-up decreased from 98% to 84% over time. A decrease in fresh stillbirth and institutional newborn mortality occurred at GARH (p < 0.05), but not in the other four regional hospitals.
conclusionNewborn resuscitation training is warranted in low-resource settings; however, the optimal training, monitoring and evaluation approach remains unclear, particularly in referral hospitals. Although, mortality reductions were observed at GARH, this cannot be solely attributed to newborn resuscitation training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.