ArticleF&S reports2020
Knowledge gaps in the understanding of fertility among non-medical graduate students.
Article in F&S reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Fertility awareness among Chinese university students: scale development and cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Knowledge of fertile period and associated factors among adolescent girls and young women in Tanzania: a nationwide survey.Reproductive health · 2025Article
- Investigating fertility health knowledge and lifestyle risk factors among Nigerian university students: A cross-sectional survey.International journal of adolescent medicine and health · 2024Article
- Psychometric properties of persian version of the cardiff fertility knowledge scale (CFKS-P).Heliyon · 2024Article
- Young Adults' Understanding of Modifiable Risk Factors of Infertility.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Family Planning, Fertility, and Medical School: A Survey of Students' Plans and Perceptions of Institutional Support.The Permanente journal · 2023Article
- Women's knowledge and attitudes to the menopause: a comparison of women over 40 who were in the perimenopause, post menopause and those not in the peri or post menopause.BMC women's health · 2023Article
- Anxiety, attitudes, and education about fertility among medical students in the United States.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Undergraduate students have low fertility knowledge and high anxiety regarding future fertility: An opportunity for education.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Fertility knowledge and views on egg freezing and family planning among surgical specialty trainees.AJOG global reports · 2022Article
- Impact of maternal education level on live birth rate after in vitro fertilization in China: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2021Article
- Article
- Fertility Health Knowledge in U.S. Adults: Men Narrowing the Knowledge Gap.American journal of men's healthArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess knowledge of female and male fertility among students enrolled in a Master of Business Administration (MBA) program.
designWeb-based cross-sectional survey.
settingAcademic setting. PATIENTS: Not applicable.
interventionsNone.
main outcome measuresKnowledge of how female and male age impacts reproduction, fecundability, and success rates with in vitro fertilization (IVF).
resultsA total of 133 female and male MBA students completed the survey. Nearly 10% of participants were not aware that women are born with a fixed number of oocytes and that oocyte quantity and quality decline with age. More than 30% of participants overestimated fecundability in women aged ≥35 years, and >50% overestimated IVF success rates in women older than 40 years. Fifteen percent of participants did not know that men have stem cells in the testes, and >25% were not aware that men experience a decrease in sperm concentration and quality with age. Nearly 30% believed that a man's age never impacts reproductive outcomes. Less than 30% of participants correctly estimated fecundability and IVF success rates based on male age.
conclusionsThese data highlight important knowledge gaps in a highly educated group of MBA students, most whom desire future childbearing. Specifically, there is a lack of understanding of both male and female reproductive aging and an overestimation of treatment success. As delayed childbearing continues, particularly among those with high educational attainment, attention should be focused on introducing broad fertility education at a younger age to improve future reproductive success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.