ArticleF&S reports2020
The association of euploid miscarriage with obesity.
Article in F&S reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Obesity Epidemic and Its Impact on Female Fertility: Current Understanding and Future Directions.Cureus · 2025Review
- Obesity and recurrent spontaneous abortion: the crucial role of weight management in pregnancy.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2025Review
- The impact of obesity on reproductive health and metabolism in reproductive-age females.Fertility and sterility · 2024Review
- Maternal Thyroid Dysfunction During Pregnancy as an Etiologic Factor in Autism Spectrum Disorder: Challenges and Opportunities for Research.Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association · 2024Review
- Personalized Nutrition in the Management of Female Infertility: New Insights on Chronic Low-Grade Inflammation.Nutrients · 2022Review
- Body mass index, not race, may be associated with an alteration in early embryo morphokinetics during in vitro fertilization.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2021Article
- Novel Insights into Normal Karyotype Miscarriage: Distinctive Patterns and Implications for Diagnosis Based on Next-Generation Sequencing Analysis.Reproductive medicine and biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine whether the frequency of euploid miscarriage is increased in obese women with early pregnancy loss.
designRetrospective cohort study.
settingAcademic medical center. PATIENTS: A total of 2,620 women with cytogenetic analysis results from products of conception after a pregnancy loss <20 weeks gestation from 2006-2018.
interventionsNone.
main outcome measuresFrequency of euploid miscarriage was compared in obese (body mass index [BMI] ≥30 kg/m
resultsA total of 2,620 women with a mean (± standard deviation) age at time of loss of 34.9 years (± 4.9) and mean (± standard deviation) BMI of 25.3 kg/m
conclusionsObese women have an increased frequency of euploid miscarriage when compared with nonobese women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.