ArticleF&S reports2020
Use of contraception among reproductive-aged women in the United States, 2014 and 2016.
Article in F&S reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07714590 (Effect of Periumbilical Vibration on Pain Perception During Intrauterine Device Insertion), which is not on this map. Cited by 49 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect of Periumbilical Vibration on Pain Perception During Intrauterine Device Insertion: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed.
- Menstrual cup use and intrauterine device expulsion in a copper intrauterine device randomized trial.Contraception · 2024Trial
- Validation of 24-hour trough concentration as a proxy for intensive pharmacokinetic measurements for a combined oral contraceptive pill containing desogestrel.Contraception · 2023Trial
- Trends in Intrauterine Device Use Before and After National Eligibility Guideline Changes.O&G open · 2026Article
- Adolescent Hormonal Contraceptive Use in the Context of Brain Development and Depression Risk: A Review and Considerations for Future Research.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2026Review
- Preferences for characteristics of contraceptive methods: a large, multi-country discrete choice experiment.BMJ global health · 2026Article
- Contraceptive use and unfulfilled preferences among women ages 15-49 years in the United States, 2022-2023.F&S reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Ovarian antral follicle dynamics from birth through reproductive maturity: a mini-review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Exploring Undergraduates' Attitudes Toward Sterilization as Contraception in the Northeastern United States: A Brief Report.Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2025Article
- Young People's Perceptions of Why Sexually Active Peers May Not Use Prescribed Contraception.Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology · 2025Article
- Nausea and Gastric Myoelectrical Activity Are Influenced by Hormonal Contraception in Chronic Gastroduodenal Disorders.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Factors influencing contraceptive use among teenage girls in Ghana: analysis of the Ghana living standard survey 7.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2025Article
- Social determinants of health and family planning: impact of food and financial insecurity on contraceptive use and pregnancy intention.Primary health care research & development · 2025Article
- Use Patterns of Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System among American Women.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2025Article
- Barriers and facilitators to contraception provision among rural healthcare providers.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2025Article
- Patient and obstetrician-gynecologist perspectives on considering long-acting reversible contraception for postpartum patients who desire permanent contraception.Contraception · 2025Article
- Review
- Contraceptive risk events among family planning specialists: a cross sectional study.Reproductive health · 2024Article
- Assessment of the Effects of Abrocitinib on the Pharmacokinetics of Probe Substrates of Cytochrome P450 1A2, 2B6 and 2C19 Enzymes and Hormonal Oral Contraceptives in Healthy Individuals.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo examine current levels, correlates of, and changes in contraceptive use among reproductive-age women in the United States between 2014 and 2016.
designWe conducted simple and multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify associations between user characteristics and contraceptive use, with specific attention to methods requiring a visit to a health care provider.
settingNot applicable. PATIENTS: All self-identified female respondents to the surveys. Secondary analysis of two rounds of the National Survey of Family Growth, an in-home, nationally representative survey of people ages 15-44 years (2013-2015) and 15-49 years (2015-2017).
interventionsNone.
main outcome measuresCurrent use of a contraceptive method, including use of individual methods and grouped method use in 2016, and change in use from 2014.
resultsContraceptive use remained steady between 2014 and 2016 among sexually active females not seeking pregnancy (88%). Among users, use of long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods increased from 14% to 18%, as use of short-acting reversible contraceptive (SARC) methods fell from 32% to 28%. Implant use among 15- to 19-year-olds rose from 6% to 16% and represents one of the largest increases observed. Access to sexual and reproductive health care was strongly associated with use of all LARC and SARC methods except for the implant (adjusted odds ratios ranged from 3.21 to 13.53).
conclusionsContraceptive users are shifting primarily among the most and moderately effective method groups, and not from contraceptive nonuse to use. Reductions in access to sexual and reproductive health care could have implications for individuals' ability to use their preferred contraceptive methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.