ArticleArchives of academic emergency medicine2021
Comparing the Accuracy of Ohmann and Alvarado Scoring Systems in Detection of Acute Appendicitis; a Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Archives of academic emergency medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diagnostic accuracy of Alvarado scoring system relative to histopathological diagnosis for acute appendicitis: A retrospective cohort study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAlvarado Scoring System (ASS) and Ohmann Scoring System (OSS) are two scoring systems for diagnosing acute appendicitis (AA). This study was designed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the two mentioned scores in detection of acute abdominal cases at risk for AA.
methodsIn this prospective cross-sectional study, patients admitted to the emergency departments of two academic hospitals in Qom, Iran, with right lower quadrant (RLQ) abdominal pain suspected to AA were evaluated. All cases were scored using ASS and OSS, and screening performance characteristics of the two scores were calculated and reported considering the pathologic findings as a gold standard.
results174 patients with a preliminary AA diagnosis and the mean age of 38.1 ± 10.63 years (11- 73) were included in this study (62.07% male). At the optimal cutoff point of ≥7 for the ASS, the sensitivity and the specificity were 46.43% (95% CI: 37.97%-55.07%), 97.05% (95% CI: 84.67%-92.93%), respectively. At the optimal cutoff point of ≥11 for the OSS, the sensitivity and the specificity were 74.29% (95% CI: 66.22%-81.29%), and 55.88% (95% CI: 37.89% - 72.82%), respectively.
conclusionBased on the finding of this study, the ASS ≥ 7 was more accurate than the OSS ≥ 11 for detection of AA. But it should be considered that the overall accuracy of Alvarado and Ohmann scores in this regard were fair (0.83) and poor (0.67), respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.