Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34223065›Full record

ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2021

Evaluating the safety and effectiveness of a nurse-led outpatient virtual IV vancomycin monitoring clinic: a retrospective cohort study.

Kate S Grattan, Mohamed Mohamed Ali, Seyed M Hosseini-Moghaddam, Hayley J I Gilmour, Gregory P Crunican, Erica Hua, Kelly A Muhsin, Rochelle Johnstone, Lise C Bondy, Megan K Devlin and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Use of Dalbavancin in Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections: Case Series from a Canadian Perspective.Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kate S GrattanSt Joseph's Health Care, London, Ontario, Canada.
Mohamed Mohamed AliSt Joseph's Health Care, London, Ontario, Canada.
Seyed M Hosseini-MoghaddamSt Joseph's Health Care, London, Ontario, Canada.
Hayley J I GilmourSt Joseph's Health Care, London, Ontario, Canada.
Gregory P CrunicanSt Joseph's Health Care, London, Ontario, Canada.
Erica HuaSt Joseph's Health Care, London, Ontario, Canada.
Kelly A MuhsinSt Joseph's Health Care, London, Ontario, Canada.
Rochelle JohnstoneLondon Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.
Lise C BondySt Joseph's Health Care, London, Ontario, Canada.
Megan K DevlinSt Joseph's Health Care, London, Ontario, Canada.
Sarah ShalhoubSt Joseph's Health Care, London, Ontario, Canada.
Sameer ElsayedSt Joseph's Health Care, London, Ontario, Canada.
Michael S SilvermanSt Joseph's Health Care, London, Ontario, Canada.
St Joseph's Health Care · CAWestern University · CALondon Health Sciences Centre · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOutpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) with vancomycin is a common treatment modality for certain Gram-positive infections. Data regarding the safety of various models of delivery are limited.

objectivesTo review outcomes of a nurse-led OPAT vancomycin monitoring service.

methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients referred to a nurse-led OPAT vancomycin clinic from December 2015 to March 2018. Patients were administered IV vancomycin in the home with active laboratory monitoring of vancomycin trough levels, renal function and complete blood count using an integrated electronic database linked with community laboratories (virtual vancomycin clinic, VVC). Monitoring was coordinated by nurses with physician approval of recommended dosing changes. Data were extracted from the electronic medical record. Demographics; clinical indication; microbial aetiology; culture source; antimicrobial regimen(s); serum creatinine and vancomycin trough values; initiation, discharge and completion dates; hospitalizations; adverse events; and outcomes were all evaluated.

resultsTwo hundred and seventy-five patients underwent a total of 301 courses of OPAT with vancomycin; 285 courses were completed. The rate of treatment discontinuation due to adverse effects was 33/301 (11.0%), with 15/33 (45.5%) being due to renal adverse effects (15/301 [5.0%] of episodes). Two of 15 (18.2%) patients developed stage 2 acute kidney injury (AKI), and no patients had stage 3 AKI or required haemodialysis. Nine of 301 (3.0%) required readmission for treatment failure. Nursing costs associated with monitoring were $63.93 CAD/patient ($48.43 USD).

conclusionsA nurse-led VVC was a safe, effective and inexpensive modality for administering outpatient vancomycin.

Identifiers

PMID34223065
PMCPMC8210185
OpenAlexW3124196836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.