Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34222996›Full record

ReviewJAC-antimicrobial resistance2020

A case study on

Annelie A Monnier, Evelina Tacconelli, Christine Årdal, Marco Cavaleri, Inge C Gyssens

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 54% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Annelie A MonnierDepartment of Internal Medicine and Center for Infectious Diseases, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5844-286X
Evelina TacconelliInfectious Diseases, Department of Diagnostic and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Christine ÅrdalNorwegian Institute of Public Health, Antimicrobial Resistance Centre, Oslo, Norway.
Marco CavaleriEuropean Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Inge C GyssensDepartment of Internal Medicine and Center for Infectious Diseases, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9226-0752
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLEuropean Medicines Agency · NLNorwegian Institute of Public Health · NOUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis case study addresses: (i) antibiotic treatment options for

methodsEvidence to address the aims was extracted from the following information sources: (i) EUCAST and CLSI recommendations, summaries of product characteristics (SPCs), antibiotic treatment guidelines and the textbook

resultsCurrent monotherapy treatment options for SAB include only three drug classes (β-lactams, glycopeptides and lipopeptides), of which two also cover MRSA bacteraemia (glycopeptides and lipopeptides). The analysis of the antibiotic pipeline and ongoing clinical trials revealed that several new antibiotics with

conclusionsAwareness of the problem of a limited antibiotic arsenal, together with incentives (e.g. push incentives), is needed to steer the R&D landscape towards the development of novel and effective antibiotics for treating SAB. In the meantime, responsible antibiotic use guided by quality indicators should preserve the effectiveness of currently available antibiotics for treating SAB.

Identifiers

PMID34222996
PMCPMC8210125
OpenAlexW3036400521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.