Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34222970›Full record

ReviewJAC-antimicrobial resistance2020

Raising awareness of antimicrobial resistance among the general public in the UK: the role of public engagement activities.

James Redfern, Laura Bowater, Lisa Coulthwaite, Joanna Verran

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Antifungal Drug Resistance.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Biofilm Control Strategies: Engaging with the Public.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

James RedfernDepartment of Natural Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0958-683X
Laura BowaterFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Lisa CoulthwaiteDepartment of Life Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
Joanna VerranDepartment of Life Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5539-6896

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In response to the accepted risk of emerging antimicrobial resistance, many organizations and institutions have developed and delivered events and activities designed to raise awareness of the issue and to change the behaviour of the intended audience. However, few of these events for a general public audience are documented or able to be sourced by those who might wish to repeat, adapt or modify, particularly those events that are successful. 'Insider knowledge' appears to be the best search tool. Moreover, evaluation of the success or impact of the event is rarely published. It would be useful if there were a 'hub' where descriptions of such activities could be deposited, enabling the building of a significant resource with real academic value.

Identifiers

PMID34222970
PMCPMC8210175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.