Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34222961›Full record

ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2020

International promotion of e-Bug, an infection prevention and control educational intervention: survey of partners across 14 countries.

Catherine Hayes, Vicki Young, Carla Brown, Pia Touboul Lundgren, Dimitra Gennimata, Jette Holt, Egbert Weisheit, Arantza Rico, Carlos Garcia, Paola De Castro and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Catherine HayesPrimary Care & Interventions Unit, PHE, Gloucester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6411-1023
Vicki YoungPrimary Care & Interventions Unit, PHE, Gloucester, UK.
Carla BrownPrimary Care & Interventions Unit, PHE, Gloucester, UK.
Pia Touboul LundgrenUniversité Côte d'Azur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Département de Santé Publique, Nice, France.
Dimitra GennimataNational School of Public Health, Athens, Greece.
Jette HoltStatens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Egbert WeisheitStudienseminar Gymnasien Kassel, Kassel, Germany.
Arantza RicoUniversity of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country, Spain.
Carlos GarciaDepartment of Education, Government of the Basque Country, Lakua C/Donostia-San Sebastián, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country, Spain.
Paola De CastroIstituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Cliodna A M McNultyPrimary Care & Interventions Unit, PHE, Gloucester, UK.
Basque Government · ESIstituto Superiore di Sanità · ITNational School of Public Health · GRStatens Serum Institut · DKUniversité Côte d'Azur · FRUniversity of the Basque Country · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global threat to public health. e-Bug is an educational resource developed and promoted by a network of international partners. e-Bug seeks to reduce the spread of infection and use of antimicrobials in young people and the community, so helping to control AMR. This study aimed to explore how e-Bug is promoted by international partners and observe barriers to promotion, including the extent of education about antibiotics in schools.

methodsA total of 29 e-Bug partners were invited to complete online questionnaires on (i) methods they use to promote e-Bug; and (ii) antibiotic topics covered in the national curriculum in their countries.

resultsFourteen and 15 of 29 e-Bug partners across Europe and Palestine completed the promotional activities and curriculum questionnaires respectively. The most frequently reported methods of promotion included endorsement and collaboration with government and non-government sectors and involvement in national and global health awareness campaigns. Barriers to promotion included a lack of time and funding. The curriculum survey data showed variation in antibiotic education across Europe and Palestine, lack of antibiotic education for children under 11 years of age and little change in antibiotic topics included in the curriculum since 2006.

conclusionsFuture and existing e-Bug partners should be encouraged to follow promotional activities reported in this paper, including ministry endorsement, educator training, international campaigns and youth programmes. We encourage all countries to increase antibiotic topics in the school curriculum across all ages.

Identifiers

PMID34222961
PMCPMC8210087
OpenAlexW3012050781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.