Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34222827›Full record

ArticleTranslational animal science2021

Effects of encapsulated cinnamaldehyde on growth performance, intestinal digestive and absorptive functions, meat quality and gut microbiota in broiler chickens.

Chongwu Yang, Moussa S Diarra, Janghan Choi, Argenis Rodas-Gonzalez, Dion Lepp, Shangxi Liu, Peng Lu, Marion Mogire, Joshua Gong, Qi Wang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational animal science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chongwu YangDepartment of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2, Canada.
Moussa S DiarraGuelph Research and Development Centre, Agriculture Agri-Food Canada, Guelph, Ontario N1G 5C9, Canada.
Janghan ChoiDepartment of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2, Canada.
Argenis Rodas-GonzalezDepartment of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2, Canada.
Dion LeppGuelph Research and Development Centre, Agriculture Agri-Food Canada, Guelph, Ontario N1G 5C9, Canada.
Shangxi LiuDepartment of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2, Canada.
Peng LuDepartment of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2, Canada.
Marion MogireDepartment of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2, Canada.
Joshua GongGuelph Research and Development Centre, Agriculture Agri-Food Canada, Guelph, Ontario N1G 5C9, Canada.
Qi WangGuelph Research and Development Centre, Agriculture Agri-Food Canada, Guelph, Ontario N1G 5C9, Canada.
Chengbo YangDepartment of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2, Canada.
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada · CAUniversity of Manitoba · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Essential oils are potential antimicrobial alternatives and their applications in animal feeds are limited due to their fast absorption in the upper gastrointestinal tract. This study investigated the effects of encapsulated cinnamaldehyde (CIN) at 50 mg/kg or 100 mg/kg on the growth performance, organ weights, meat quality, intestinal morphology, jejunal gene expression, nutrient digestibility, and ileal and cecal microbiota. A total of 320 male day-old broiler Cobb-500 chicks were randomly allocated to four treatments with eight pens per treatment (10 birds per pen): 1) basal diet (negative control, NC); 2) basal diet supplemented with 30 mg/kg avilamycin premix (positive control, PC); 3) basal diet with 50 mg/kg encapsulated CIN (EOL); 4) basal diet with 100 mg/kg encapsulated CIN (EOH). Despite birds fed EOH tended to increase (

Indexed as

antimicrobial alternativesbroiler chickensencapsulated essential oilsgut healthmeat quality

Identifiers

PMID34222827
PMCPMC8252029
OpenAlexW3133519028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.