ArticleNorthern clinics of Istanbul2021
Reaction frequency to the skin prick test of inhalant and food allergens in children.
Article in Northern clinics of Istanbul, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWhen applied by well-trained personnel, skin prick test (SPT) for a variety of inhalant and/or food allergens is a safe procedure although it may rarely cause systemic reaction. In this article, our aim was to evaluate the reactions after SPTs for the past 6 years in Turkish children having various allergic symptoms brought to our clinic.
methodsThe results of the SPTs, performed between May 2013 and March 2019, of 12.529 patients whose ages vary from 2 months to 18 years have been retrospectively evaluated.
resultsThe average age of the patients who were included in this study was 6.12±4.38 years and 46.4% of them were female. When the patients were categorized according to the diagnosis, it was observed that 4.858 of them with symptoms suggesting asthma; 2.720 of them having symptoms suggesting allergic rhinitis; 1.795 of them having rashes; 906 of them with atopic dermatitis; 352 of them having symptoms suggesting food allergy and the remaining 1.898 with symptoms suggesting various diagnoses. In this study, which reflects our 6-year experience from the results of 12.529 patients, post-SPT reactions have been observed in 9 out of 12.529 patients (0.07%). They were three females and six males. These reactions were observed in 3 eczemas, 2 urticaria, 2 allergic rhinitis, and 2 suggested diagnosis of asthma patients. Their mean age was 5.9±3.5 years. SPT reactions were mostly seen in our five patients having skin disorder (eczema and rashes). The most frequent symptom of vasovagal reaction was syncope, occuring between 1 and 20 min after SPT, in eight of nine patients.
conclusionDuring our study, any systemic reaction or anaphylaxis to SPT was not observed. The non-systemic reaction (vasovagal reaction) rate was 7/10.000, similar to the literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.