Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34222779›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2021

Recurrent strokes in an occult case of recurrent

Charles Fry, Christopher P Primus, Robert Serafino-Wani, Simon Woldman

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Charles FryBarts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, W Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7238-4651
Christopher P PrimusBarts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, W Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7464-5210
Robert Serafino-WaniBarts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, W Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6707-2699
Simon WoldmanBarts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, W Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2156-4019
St Bartholomew's Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfective endocarditis (IE) is a known but uncommon cause of cardioembolic stroke and there are rare but recognized cases of IE without an inflammatory response. CASE SUMMARY: A 47-year-old man presented with a multi-focal stroke suggestive of a cardioembolic source. Outpatient transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) was concerning for vegetation or thrombus associated with his previous mitral valve repair. He remained clinically well, with no evidence of an inflammatory response and sterile blood cultures. Computed tomography-positron emission tomography (CT-PET) corroborated the TOE findings, however, given the atypical presentation, he was treated for valvular thrombus. Following discharge, he quickly re-presented with further embolic phenomena and underwent emergency mitral valve replacement. Intraoperative findings were consistent with prosthetic valve IE (PVE) and a 6-week course of antibiotics commenced. DISCUSSION: In patients presenting with multi-territory stroke, IE should be considered despite sterile blood cultures and absent inflammatory response.

Indexed as

Case reportCutibacterium acnes (Propionibacterium acnes)Endocarditis TeamInfective endocarditisPETPositron emission tomographyProsthetic valve endocarditisTransoesophageal echocardiography

Identifiers

PMID34222779
PMCPMC8244629
OpenAlexW3167507393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.