Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34222735›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in physiology2021

Proprioception revisited: where do we stand?

Jennifer L Shadrach, Julieta Gomez-Frittelli, Julia A Kaltschmidt

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clarifying Proprioceptive Training: A Narrative Review.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Quantity and Distribution of Muscle Spindles in Animal and Human Muscles.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer L ShadrachDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Julieta Gomez-FrittelliWu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Julia A KaltschmidtDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Neurosciences Institute · USStanford University · US

Funding

Molecular Mechanisms Regulating Inhibitory Circuitry in the Spinal CordR01NS083998 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KALTSCHMIDT, JULIA ANNA · 2013 to 2023
$3.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS083998
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Originally referred to as 'muscle sense', the notion that skeletal muscle held a peripheral sensory function was first described early in the 19

Identifiers

PMID34222735
PMCPMC8244174
OpenAlexW3133755599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.