Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34222702›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2021

Effect of cage size on

Dubravka Pudar, Arianna Puggioli, Fabrizio Balestrino, Victoria Sy, Marco Carrieri, Romeo Bellini, Dušan Petrić

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Insects · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dubravka PudarLaboratory for Medical and Veterinary Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Arianna PuggioliSanitary Entomology & Zoology Department, Centro Agricoltura Ambiente "G. Nicoli" - IAEA Collaborating Centre, Crevalcore, Bologna, Italy.
Fabrizio BalestrinoSanitary Entomology & Zoology Department, Centro Agricoltura Ambiente "G. Nicoli" - IAEA Collaborating Centre, Crevalcore, Bologna, Italy.
Victoria SySanitary Entomology & Zoology Department, Centro Agricoltura Ambiente "G. Nicoli" - IAEA Collaborating Centre, Crevalcore, Bologna, Italy.
Marco CarrieriSanitary Entomology & Zoology Department, Centro Agricoltura Ambiente "G. Nicoli" - IAEA Collaborating Centre, Crevalcore, Bologna, Italy.
Romeo BelliniSanitary Entomology & Zoology Department, Centro Agricoltura Ambiente "G. Nicoli" - IAEA Collaborating Centre, Crevalcore, Bologna, Italy.
Dušan PetrićLaboratory for Medical and Veterinary Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background

methodsThis study compared the influence of three differently sized cages for

resultsIn all tested cages, we identified two periods separated by the generation showing the minimum value of each considered parameter (wing length, adult survival and egg production). The wing length and adult survival passed through the phases of initial decrease to about intermediate colonization time, and increased afterwards. Fecundity was steady during the first period and increased in the second one. Cage C1 demonstrated not only the best values for all parameters but also the smallest decrease in the initial phase. Recovering of the caged mosquitoes in the second half of the study was higher in cages C1 and C2, than in C3.

conclusionsC1 provided the least negative selection pressure on wing length, adult survival and egg production for reared

Indexed as

Adult cage sizeColonizationMosquito mass-rearingSpace optimizationSterile insect technique

Identifiers

PMID34222702
PMCPMC8242996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.