Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34222687›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2021

Development and validity of semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire as a new research tool for sugar intake assessment among Indonesian adolescents.

Qonita Rachmah, Wantanee Kriengsinyos, Nipa Rojroongwasinkul, Tippawan Pongcharoen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Qonita RachmahDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia.
Wantanee KriengsinyosNutrition and Dietetics Program, Institute of Nutrition, Mahidol University, Thailand.
Nipa RojroongwasinkulNutrition and Dietetics Program, Institute of Nutrition, Mahidol University, Thailand.
Tippawan PongcharoenNutrition and Dietetics Program, Institute of Nutrition, Mahidol University, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robust evidence has shown that sugar is a major contributor to obesity and Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs). However, there have not been sufficient tools to estimate sugar intakes. Therefore, developing a new and valid tool to assess sugar intake, based on cultural eating habits, is crucial. The study was done in two phases; the first focused on the development of Semi-quantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire (SFFQ), and the second focused on researching the validity of the questionnaire. Food items in the SFFQ were selected from the latest national survey review, exploratory survey, and food market observation. Forty-nine food items were included in the final SFFQ with five open-ended questions for fruit groups. One hundred and six adolescents aged 15-17 years participated in the study. The total sugar intake among the adolescents was 58.80 g/day (52.7 g sucrose; 1.47 g fructose; 1.49 glucose) which contributed to 11.6% of the total energy intake per day. The reliability analysis showed a good agreement between the two administered SFFQs in a one-month interval. The relative validity results, using 6-days food diaries as a reference method, demonstrated a superior ability to rank individuals into the same and adjacent classification and only <10% gross misclassification in all sugar intakes. The developed SFFQ in turn has been proven to have moderate to good validity and be applicable for a larger epidemiological study.

Indexed as

AdolescentsDietary toolObesitySemi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (SFFQ)Sugar intakeValidity

Identifiers

PMID34222687
PMCPMC8242999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.