Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34222627›Full record

ArticleEndoscopy international open2021

Simple feedback of colonoscopy performance improved the number of adenomas per colonoscopy and serrated polyp detection rate.

Osamu Toyoshima, Shuntaro Yoshida, Toshihiro Nishizawa, Tadahiro Yamakawa, Toru Arano, Yoshihiro Isomura, Takamitsu Kanazawa, Hidehiko Ando, Yosuke Tsuji, Kazuhiko Koike

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopy international open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Quality indicators for colonoscopy.Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2024
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Impact of looping on premalignant polyp detection during colonoscopy.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Osamu ToyoshimaGastroenterology, Toyoshima Endoscopy Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.
Shuntaro YoshidaGastroenterology, Toyoshima Endoscopy Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshihiro NishizawaGastroenterology, Toyoshima Endoscopy Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.
Tadahiro YamakawaGastroenterology, Toyoshima Endoscopy Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.
Toru AranoGastroenterology, Toyoshima Endoscopy Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshihiro IsomuraGastroenterology, Toyoshima Endoscopy Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.
Takamitsu KanazawaGastroenterology, Toyoshima Endoscopy Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.
Hidehiko AndoGastroenterology, Ando Family Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.
Yosuke TsujiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuhiko KoikeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID34222627
PMCPMC8211485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.