ArticleArthroplasty today2021
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Is Not Associated With Increased Revision Rates in Obese Patients.
Article in Arthroplasty today, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Obesity has no adverse effect on the survival of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in a long-term follow-up of 16 years.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Effect of body mass index on symptomatic venous thromboembolism and prosthesis revision risk after total knee arthroplasty: a long-term study from China.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is controversy among arthroplasty surgeons in regard to performing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in obese patients based on current literature. The aim of this study is to investigate whether UKA is associated with increased complications and revision rates in obese (body mass index [BMI] > 30 kg/m
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed all UKAs performed at our institution from January 2008 to December 2017. A total of 2178 UKA procedures were performed during this period. The patients were categorized based on BMI to include normal weight (BMI = 20-30 kg/m
resultsThe 2178 UKA cases were eligible for inclusion in this investigation. We performed 2028 medial UKAs and 150 lateral UKAs. The mean clinical follow-up period was 3.7 years, and the mean time from index surgery to revision was 7.2 years. Of the 2178 UKA cases, 1167 had a 3-year minimum follow-up. The overall revision rate in all patients was 2.2%. There was no significant difference (
conclusionsSimilar rates of revision were found for UKAs performed on obese, morbidly obese, or super morbid obese patients (≤2.0% revision rate) vs normal BMI (2.7% revision rate) patients. Progressive osteoarthritis was the most common mechanism of UKA failure. Obesity is not a contraindication for UKA despite previous recommendations to the contrary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.