Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34222424›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2021

Application of intelligent algorithms in Down syndrome screening during second trimester pregnancy.

Hong-Guo Zhang, Yu-Ting Jiang, Si-Da Dai, Ling Li, Xiao-Nan Hu, Rui-Zhi Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hong-Guo ZhangCenter for Reproductive Medicine and Center for Prenatal Diagnosis, First Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, Jilin Province, China.
Yu-Ting JiangCenter for Reproductive Medicine and Center for Prenatal Diagnosis, First Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, Jilin Province, China.
Si-Da DaiCollege of Communication Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, Jilin Province, China.
Ling LiCollege of Communication Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, Jilin Province, China.
Xiao-Nan HuCenter for Reproductive Medicine and Center for Prenatal Diagnosis, First Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, Jilin Province, China.
Rui-Zhi LiuCenter for Reproductive Medicine and Center for Prenatal Diagnosis, First Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, Jilin Province, China. lrz410@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDown syndrome (DS) is one of the most common chromosomal aneuploidy diseases. Prenatal screening and diagnostic tests can aid the early diagnosis, appropriate management of these fetuses, and give parents an informed choice about whether or not to terminate a pregnancy. In recent years, investigations have been conducted to achieve a high detection rate (DR) and reduce the false positive rate (FPR). Hospitals have accumulated large numbers of screened cases. However, artificial intelligence methods are rarely used in the risk assessment of prenatal screening for DS.

aimTo use a support vector machine algorithm, classification and regression tree algorithm, and AdaBoost algorithm in machine learning for modeling and analysis of prenatal DS screening.

methodsThe dataset was from the Center for Prenatal Diagnosis at the First Hospital of Jilin University. We designed and developed intelligent algorithms based on the synthetic minority over-sampling technique (SMOTE)-Tomek and adaptive synthetic sampling over-sampling techniques to preprocess the dataset of prenatal screening information. The machine learning model was then established. Finally, the feasibility of artificial intelligence algorithms in DS screening evaluation is discussed.

resultsThe database contained 31 DS diagnosed cases, accounting for 0.03% of all patients. The dataset showed a large difference between the numbers of DS affected and non-affected cases. A combination of over-sampling and under-sampling techniques can greatly increase the performance of the algorithm at processing non-balanced datasets. As the number of iterations increases, the combination of the classification and regression tree algorithm and the SMOTE-Tomek over-sampling technique can obtain a high DR while keeping the FPR to a minimum.

conclusionThe support vector machine algorithm and the classification and regression tree algorithm achieved good results on the DS screening dataset. When the T21 risk cutoff value was set to 270, machine learning methods had a higher DR and a lower FPR than statistical methods.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsClassification and regression treeDown syndromePrenatal screeningRisk cutoff valueSupport vector machine

Identifiers

PMID34222424
PMCPMC8223828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.