Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34222297›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2021

Effects of Pasteurization and High-Pressure Processing of Camel and Bovine Cheese Quality, and Proteolysis Contribution to Camel Cheese Softness.

Mustapha Mbye, Huda Mohamed, Tholkappiyan Ramachandran, Fathalla Hamed, Ahlam AlHammadi, Rabih Kamleh, Afaf Kamal-Eldin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mustapha MbyeDepartment of Food Science, United Arab Emirates University, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Huda MohamedDepartment of Food Science, United Arab Emirates University, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Tholkappiyan RamachandranDepartment of Physics, United Arab Emirates University, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Fathalla HamedDepartment of Physics, United Arab Emirates University, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Ahlam AlHammadiAgthia Public Joint Stock Company (PJSC) Group of Companies, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Rabih KamlehAgthia Public Joint Stock Company (PJSC) Group of Companies, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Afaf Kamal-EldinDepartment of Food Science, United Arab Emirates University, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effects of high-pressure processing (HPP) compared to thermal treatments on the quality of camel vs. bovine cheeses were studied. The study showed that camel milk has a lower microbial load compared to bovine milk, which is maintained during 7 days' storage of the processed milk. The effect of three HPP treatments (350, 450, and 550 MPa for 5 min at 4°C) and two pasteurization treatments (65°C for 30 min and 75°C for 30 s) on the quality of soft unripened camel and bovine milk cheeses were accessed. The cheeses were evaluated for pH, yield, proximate composition, textural and rheological properties, microstructure, and protein profile by SDS-PAGE electrophoresis. The effects of the treatments on cheese's hardness were different between the camel and bovine cheeses; while heat treatment at 65°C for 30 min gave the hardest bovine milk cheese (1,253 ± 20), HPP treatment at 350 MPa for 5 min gave the highest value for camel milk cheese (519 ± 5) (

Indexed as

bovine milkcamel milkcheese qualityhigh pressure processingpasteurization

Identifiers

PMID34222297
PMCPMC8248178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.