Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34222122›Full record

ReviewClinical and experimental vaccine research2021

Comparison of regulatory framework of clinical trial with genetically modified organism-containing vaccines in the Europe, Australia, and Switzerland.

Jobin Jose, Swathi Pai

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and experimental vaccine research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jobin JoseN.G.S.M. Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, NITTE Deemed to be University, Mangalore, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2815-5384
Swathi PaiN.G.S.M. Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, NITTE Deemed to be University, Mangalore, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8456-3764
Nitte University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New vaccines production and manufacture have revolutionized by recombinant technology. Various regulatory associations are engaged with the appraisal of a clinical trial with genetically modified organisms. At present safe, effective vaccines are needed in order to control the various emerging diseases which are a major cause of mortality. In reality, most vaccines raise biosafety worries with respect to human wellbeing. "Federal Office for Environment" is the competent authority for environmental risk assessments in Switzerland. Gene Technology Act 2000 is the fundamental direction that provides the necessary information to carry the clinical trials with genetically modified organism-containing vaccines. In addition, regulatory framework for "clinical trial with genetically modified organisms-containing vaccines" is stringent and partially harmonized in Switzerland, the European Union and Australia. In this study, we mainly concerned with regulatory aspects of "clinical trial with genetically modified organism" containing vaccine in three regions. This review includes various aspects like ethics, guidelines related to clinical trials of vaccines with genetically modified organisms.

Indexed as

Clinical trialEthical approvalGenetically modified organismRegulatory statusVaccine

Identifiers

PMID34222122
PMCPMC8217574
OpenAlexW3173960165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.