ArticleJournal of diabetes and metabolic disorders2021
Assessment of fecal
Article in Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hesperetin mitigates IBD-associated bone loss viaJournal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Article
- Akkermansia muciniphila and Its Bioactive Derivatives: Emerging Regulators of Healthy Aging.Aging cell · 2026Review
- PasteurizedFrontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Enhancing Akkermansia growth via phytohormones: a strategy to modulate the gut-bone axis in postmenopausal osteoporosis therapy.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Review
- Investigating the role ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Delineating the nexus between gut-intratumoral microbiome and osteo-immune system in bone metastases.Bone reports · 2024Review
- Review
- The association between gut microbiota and resting metabolic rate in overweight/obese women: a case-control study.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2024Article
- Gut microbial community and fecal metabolomic signatures in different types of osteoporosis animal models.Aging · 2024Article
- Strontium ranelate enriched Ruminococcus albus in the gut microbiome of Sprague-Dawley rats with postmenopausal osteoporosis.BMC microbiology · 2023Article
- Effect of Fermented Concentrate on Ruminal Fermentation, Ruminal and Fecal Microbiome, and Growth Performance of Beef Cattle.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Review
- Inferring Bacterial Community Interactions and Functionalities Associated with Osteopenia and Osteoporosis in Taiwanese Postmenopausal Women.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Health and Disease:Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2023Article
- Interindividual differences contribute to variation in microbiota composition more than hormonal status: A prospective study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Article
- Gut microbiota and fecal metabolic signatures in rat models of disuse-induced osteoporosis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesOsteoporosis is characterized by slow deterioration in bone mass and disruption of its structure, leading to an increased risk of bone fractures. Gut microbiota plays an important role in the transport and absorption of nutrients needed for bone health.
methodsA total of 36 subjects including eight with osteoporosis (three men and five women), eight with osteopenia (two men and six women), and 20 normal controls (six men and 14 women) were selected. Microbial genome was extracted from fresh stool samples. The bacterial load was determined by quantitative real-time PCR using 16S rRNA specific primers.
resultsThe participants' mean age in the osteoporosis, osteopenia and control groups were 61.71, 45 and 45.05 years, respectively. The majority of osteoporosis patients were post-menopause women, while in osteopenia group was pre-menopause. There were significant differences in terms of age, T-score, Z-score, and menopause among groups (
conclusionsIn conclusion, however, there was no statistically significant difference between the study groups; it seems that the load of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.