Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34221977›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2021

Comparative Risk of Renal Adverse Events in Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.

Kang Liu, Zhongke Qin, Xueqiang Xu, Ting Li, Yifei Ge, Huijuan Mao, Changying Xing

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Acute Kidney Injury Induced by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.Kidney diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kang LiuDepartment of Nephrology, Jiangsu Province Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, China.
Zhongke QinDepartment of Nephrology, Jiangsu Province Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, China.
Xueqiang XuDepartment of Nephrology, Jiangsu Province Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, China.
Ting LiDepartment of Nephrology, Jiangsu Province Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, China.
Yifei GeDepartment of Nephrology, Jiangsu Province Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, China.
Huijuan MaoDepartment of Nephrology, Jiangsu Province Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, China.
Changying XingDepartment of Nephrology, Jiangsu Province Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, China.
Jiangsu Province Hospital · CNNanjing Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have brought a paradigm shift to cancer treatment. However, little is known about the risk of renal adverse events (RAEs) of ICI-based regimens, especially ICI combination therapy.

methodsWe carried out a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the risk of RAEs between ICI-based regimens and traditional cancer therapy, including chemotherapy and targeted therapy. Subgroup analysis was conducted based on tumor types.

resultsNinety-five eligible RCTs involving 40,552 participants were included. The overall incidence of RAEs, grade 3-5 RAEs, acute kidney injury (AKI), and grade 3-5 AKI was 4.3%, 1.2%, 1.3%, and 0.8%, respectively. Both ICI-based treatment regimens and traditional cancer therapy showed significantly higher risk of RAEs and AKI than the placebo. Among ICI monotherapy, anti-PD-1 (RR: 0.51, 95%CI: 0.29-0.91) was significantly safer than anti-CTLA-4 in terms of RAEs. Anti-CTLA-4 showed significantly higher toxicity than anti-PD-1 (RR: 0.33, 95%CI: 0.14-0.77), anti-PD-L1 (RR: 0.38, 95%CI:0.16-0.91), and anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4 (RR: 0.32, 95%CI: 0.12-0.87) in terms of grade 3-5 RAEs. The difference was not significant between ICI monotherapy and traditional cancer therapy, except that targeted therapy seemed the least toxic therapy in terms of the incidence of AKI. Anti-CTLA-4 plus anti-PD-1 were associated with higher risk of RAEs than anti-PD-1 (RR: 1.61, 95%CI: 1.02-2.56). The difference was not significant between other dual ICI regimens and ICI monotherapy in terms of RAEs and AKI. ICI plus chemotherapy showed increased risk of both RAEs and AKI compared with ICI monotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy. The overall results remained robust in the meta-regression and sensitivity analyses.

conclusionsAmong ICI monotherapy, anti-CTLA-4 appeared to be associated with increased toxicity, especially in terms of grade 3-5 RAEs. Anti-CTLA-4 plus anti-PD-1 were associated with higher risk of RAEs than anti-PD-1. However, the difference was not significant between other dual ICI regimens and ICI monotherapy in terms of RAEs and AKI. ICIs plus chemotherapy seemed to be the most toxic treatment regimen in terms of RAEs, AKI, and grade 3-5 AKI. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, identifier CRD42020197039.

Indexed as

acute kidney injurycancerimmune checkpoint inhibitorsrenal adverse eventstreatment regimen

Identifiers

PMID34221977
PMCPMC8242344
OpenAlexW3171342260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.