Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34221947›Full record

ReviewAnesthesiology and pain medicine2021

Surgical and Non-surgical Treatment Options for Piriformis Syndrome: A Literature Review.

Neeraj Vij, Hayley Kiernan, Roy Bisht, Ian Singleton, Elyse M Cornett, Alan David Kaye, Farnad Imani, Giustino Varrassi, Maryam Pourbahri, Omar Viswanath and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Anesthesiology and pain medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Deep Gluteal syndrome: An underestimated cause of posterior hip pain.Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Trigger Point Injections.Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Neeraj VijUniversity of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7214-0411
Hayley KiernanUniversity of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, USA.
Roy BishtUniversity of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, USA.
Ian SingletonUniversity of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, USA.
Elyse M CornettDepartment of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, Shreveport, USA.
Alan David KayeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, Shreveport, USA.
Farnad ImaniPain Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0814-0772
Giustino VarrassiPaolo Procacci Foundation, Roma, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3822-2923
Maryam PourbahriPain Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Omar ViswanathUniversity of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6124-7037
Ivan UritsDepartment of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, Shreveport, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3652-6085
University of Arizona · USLouisiana State University · USIran University of Medical Sciences · IRCreighton University · USFondazione Roma · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextPiriformis syndrome is a solely clinical diagnosis that often eludes the practitioner and goes underdiagnosed. PS is a pain syndrome and for those it affects, causes persistent pain and limits daily activity and work capacity. It is a form of deep gluteal syndrome that needs to be considered on the differential of low back pain as it comprises between 0.3% - 6% of all low back pain cases and is frequently underdiagnosed. Piriformis syndrome may be primary due anatomic anomalies or secondary, though the majority of cases are secondary to some insult. The objective of this manuscript is to provide a description of the epidemiology and presentation of piriformis as well as both non-operative and operative treatment options. We review all of the recent clinical evidence regarding the aforementioned therapies. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Literature searches were performed using the below MeSH Terms using Mendeley version 1.19.4. Search fields were varied until further searches revealed no new articles. All articles were screened by title and abstract. Decision was made to include an article based on its relevance and the list of final articles was approved three of the authors. This included reading the entirety of the article. Any question regarding the inclusion of an article was discussed by all authors until an agreement was reached.

resultsMedical management and physical therapy show some promise; however, when conservative treatment fails minimally invasive methods such as steroid injections, botulinum toxin injections, dry needling are all efficacious and there is substantial clinical evidence regarding these therapies. In those patients in which minimally invasive techniques do not result in an adequate relief of pain and return of function, endoscopic release can be considered. Endoscopic release is far superior to open release of the piriformis syndrome given the higher success and lower rate of complications.

conclusionsPiriformis syndrome is an important differential diagnosis in the work up of lower back pain and should not be ruled out with proper examination and testing. Clinicians should consider medical management and conservative management in the initial treatment plan for piriformis syndrome. There are many options within the conservative management and the literature shows much promise regarding these. Physical therapy, steroid injections, botulinum toxin injections, and dry needling are all potentially effective therapies with few adverse effects. Surgical options remain as gold standard, but only when conservative management has failed and the symptoms are significant to affect daily living activities. Endoscopic decompression of the sciatic nerve with or without release of the piriformis muscle has a reported high likelihood of success and a low complication rate. Current literature supports the preference of the endoscopic approach over the open approach due to improved outcomes and decreased complications. Further research is to well define the metrics for the diagnosis of piriformis syndrome and may include a need to develop diagnostic criteria.

Indexed as

Deep Gluteal SyndromeMinimally InvasivePhysical TherapyPiriformis SyndromeSteroid InjectionsSurgical Treatment

Identifiers

PMID34221947
PMCPMC8241586
OpenAlexW3128587644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.