Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34221717›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2021

The protective effect of

Musarat Amina, Ramesa Shafi Bhat, Abeer M Al-Dbass, Nawal M Musayeib, Rania Fahmy, Leen Alhadlaq, Afaf El-Ansary

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. RSC advances · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Musarat AminaDepartment of Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ramesa Shafi BhatDepartment of Biochemistry, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abeer M Al-DbassDepartment of Biochemistry, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Nawal M MusayeibDepartment of Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Rania FahmyDepartment of Optometry, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, r, Saudi Arabia.
Leen AlhadlaqCollege of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Afaf El-AnsaryCentral Laboratory, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlutamate excitotoxicity can cause DNA damage and is linked to many retinal and neurological disorders. In mammals, the visual signal from the eyes to the brain is conducted only by retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), which can be damaged by overstimulation of glutamate receptors. METHODOLOGY: We examined the protective effects of

resultsThe

conclusion

Indexed as

Comet assayDNA damageGlutamateMoringa oleiferaRetinal Ganglion Cel

Identifiers

PMID34221717
PMCPMC8231317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.