Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34221646›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2021

Peripheral vision and hazard detection with average phakic and pseudophakic optical errors.

Abinaya Priya Venkataraman, Robert Rosén, Aixa Alarcon Heredia, Patricia Piers, Carmen Canovas Vidal, Linda Lundström

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Impact of Peripheral Refractive Errors in Mobility Performance.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Abinaya Priya VenkataramanDepartment of Applied Physics, Biomedical and X-ray Physics, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2155-7030
Robert RosénJohnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, R&D, Groningen, Netherlands.
Aixa Alarcon HerediaJohnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, R&D, Groningen, Netherlands.
Patricia PiersJohnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, R&D, Groningen, Netherlands.
Carmen Canovas VidalJohnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, R&D, Groningen, Netherlands.
Linda LundströmDepartment of Applied Physics, Biomedical and X-ray Physics, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4894-7944

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impact of peripheral optical errors induced by intraocular lenses was evaluated by simulating the average phakic and pseudophakic image qualities. An adaptive optics system was used to simulate the optical errors in 20° nasal and inferior visual field in phakic subjects. Peripheral resolution acuity, contrast sensitivity and hazard detection were evaluated. Pseudophakic errors typical for monofocal designs had a negative effect on resolution acuity and contrast sensitivity and the hazard detection task also showed increased false positive and misses and a longer reaction time compared to phakic optical errors. The induced peripheral pseudophakic optical errors affect the peripheral visual performance and thereby impact functional vision.

Identifiers

PMID34221646
PMCPMC8221950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.