Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34221605›Full record

ReviewSurgical neurology international2021

The historic evolution of intracranial pressure and cerebrospinal fluid pulse pressure concepts: Two centuries of challenges.

Nicollas Nunes Rabelo, Josué da Silva Brito, Jassiara Soares da Silva, Nicolli Bellotti de Souza, Giselle Coelho, Sérgio Brasil, Gustavo Frigieri

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Surgical neurology international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nicollas Nunes RabeloDepartment of Neurology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo-SP, Brazil.
Josué da Silva BritoDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University Center Atenas, Paracatu-MG, Brazil.
Jassiara Soares da SilvaDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University Center Atenas, Paracatu-MG, Brazil.
Nicolli Bellotti de SouzaDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University Center Atenas, Paracatu-MG, Brazil.
Giselle CoelhoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Santa Marcelina Hospital, São Paulo-SP, Brazil.
Sérgio BrasilDepartment of Neurology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo-SP, Brazil.
Gustavo FrigieriDepartment of Phisycs, Braincare Technological Development and Innovation, São Carlos-SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a consensus on the importance of monitoring intracranial pressure (ICP) during neurosurgery, and this monitoring reduces mortality during procedures. Current knowledge of ICP and cerebrospinal fluid pulse pressure has been built thanks to more than two centuries of research on brain dynamics.

methodsArticles and books were selected using the descriptors "ICP," "cerebrospinal fluid pulse," "monitoring," "Monro-Kellie doctrine," and "ICP waveform" in electronic databases PubMed, Lilacs, Science Direct, and EMBASE.

resultsSeveral anatomists and physiologists have helped clarify the patterns of intracranial volumes under normal and pathological conditions. Monro-Kellie doctrine was an important step in a story that is reconstructed in this article. Through documentary research, we report the contribution of important medical figures, such as Monro, Kellie, Abercrombie, Burrows, Cushing, Langfitt, Marmarou, and other physiologists and anatomists who left their marks on the history of Medicine.

conclusionUnderstanding intracranial dynamics is an unfinished historical construction. Current knowledge is the result of two centuries of research that began with the investigations of Alexander Monro

Indexed as

Cerebrospinal fluid pulse pressureHistory of medicineIntracranial pressure

Identifiers

PMID34221605
PMCPMC8247667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.